Skip to main content

Full text of "Hanging in chains"

See other formats


Hanging 


in  Chains 


* 


[ 


JOSEPH  N9DOH0UGH 
RARE  BOOKS 

i     ALBANY  -  N.Y. 


^ 


^ 


^ 


V 


Digitized  by  the  Internet  Archive 

in  2010  with  funding  from 

Open  Knowledge  Commons  and  Harvard  Medical  School 


http://www.archive.org/details/hanginginchainsOOhart 


PIRATES    CHAINS. 

{From    the    Thames.) 


Hanging  in  Chains 


BY 

ALBERT   HARTSHORNE,   F.S.A. 


*£* 


"  No,  no ;  let  them  hang,  and  their  names  rot,  and  their 
crimes  live  for  ever  against  them "  (Mercy  to  Great- 
heart  :  The  PilgrinCs  Progress,  Chapter  iv.). 


THE   CASSELL   PUBLISHING   COMPANY 
104  &    106   FOURTH  AVENUE 

MDCCCXCIII 


ptREFcACE. 


*# 


F  the  twelve  regular  me- 
thods of  proceeding  in  the 
courts  of  criminal  jurisdic- 
tion in  England,  the  last 
— that  of  execution — is  the  only  one 
that  is  particularly  treated  of  in  the 
following  pages.  "  Sus.  per  col."  has 
been,  as  it  were,  the  only  warrant ;  but 
in  attempting  to  trace  some  items  in  a 
record  that  runs  like  a  scarlet  thread 
through  the  long  course  of  events  that 
constitutes  history,    it    has    not   been 


vi  PREFACE. 

possible,  on  the  one  hand,  to  avoid 
touching  upon  other  modes  and  details 
of  capital  punishment  in  England,  or, 
on  the  other,  to  escape  from  straying 
somewhat  into  the  catalogue  of  what 
Blackstone  calls  "  the  shocking  appa- 
ratus of  death  and  punishment  "  to  be 
met  with  in  the  criminal  codes  of  other 
European  nations.  And  while  this 
course  has  been  pursued, — certainly 
rather  by  way  of  comment  and  illustra- 
tion, than  with  any  desire  to  "  accumu- 
late horrors  on  horror's  head," — an 
endeavour  has  also  been  made,  in 
carrying  down  the  pitiful  story,  to 
dissipate  some  of  the  clouds  of  mystery 
and  fable  that  have  clustered  round 
the  Gibbet.  Removed,  as  we  happily 
are  by  time,  from  a  period  when  it 
was  lawful,  and  even  accepted  as 
fitting,  that  men  who  bore  the  brand 
of  Cain  should  be  made  the  subject  of 
a  revolting  and  disgraceful  spectacle, 


PREFACE.  vii 

we  can  approach  the  matter  without 
prejudice,  and  with  proper  calmness  ; 
but  it  is,  perhaps,  not  so  easy  at  once 
to  realize  how  great  is  the  change  that 
has  taken  place  in  national  feeling  and 
sympathy  since  George  the  Third  was 
king.  And  if  humanity  would  recoil 
to-day  with  abhorrence  from  the  ac- 
tual gibbet,  sensation  itself  would  be 
stunned  at  the  punishment  for  High 
Treason, — at  the  drawing  and  quarter- 
ing of  patriots,  whose  names  may 
shine  in  history  "  through  their  tears 
like  wrinkled  pebbles  in  a  glassy 
stream."  It  will  be  borne  in  mind 
that  the  gallows  and  the  gibbet  are 
the  most  ancient  instruments  of  capital 
punishment  in  the  world ;  as  such  they 
have  a  distinct  archaeological  as  well 
as  a  legal  interest ;  and,  inasmuch  as 
it  appears  that  the  custom  of  exposing 
human  bodies  in  irons  and  chains  is 
almost  peculiar  to  this  country,  doubt- 


viii  PREFACE. 

less  no  further  motive  need  be  adduced 
for  now  bringing  together  these  scat- 
tered English  notices.  And  it  is 
thought  that  what  may  be  lacking  in 
other  respects  may  be  somewhat  com- 
pensated for  by  the  historical  and 
antiquarian  features,  so  that,  in  spite 
of  its  rather  ominous  title,  the  book 
may  be  found  not  entirely  repellent. 

Bradbourne  Hall,  Ashbourne. 
April,  1 891. 


sP 


TqABLE  of  co^qte^qts. 


Jr 


CHAPTER  I. 


Gibbeting  and  exposure  with  the  ancient  Jews  ; 
their  strong  desire  for  burial,  and  abhor- 
rence at  being  cast  out, — exemplified  from 
the  Scriptures, — David,  Jotham,  Azariah  ; 
Jehoiakim.  Gibbeting  with  the  Egyp- 
tians ;  the  Chief  Baker.  The  watches  of 
Rizpah  ;  the  seven  crosses.  Desire  of  the 
Greeks  for  interment ;  examples  from  the 
Iliad;  the  ^Eneid.  Gibbeting  with  the 
Etruscans,  Pliny  ;  the  Cross.  Gibbeting 
with  the  Romans ;  their  dread  of  exposure, 
Ovid  ;  the  Cross,  the  Gibbet.  The  Great 
Sacrifice.     Gibbeting  of  Saints     ...     ...     I-J2 


x  TABLE  OF  CONTENTS. 

CHAPTER  II. 

PAGE 

Gibbeting  with  the  Anglo-Saxons  ;  Hanging 
in  Chains.  High  Treason, — punishment 
for, — examples  in  fourteenth,  fifteenth,  and 
sixteenth  centuries.  Drawing  and  Quar- 
tering. Wallace ;  the  Despencers  ;  Hot- 
spur. Executions  for  "  the — 45."  Gibbet- 
ing in  Jersey.  Gallows  and  Gibbet, — 
difference  between,  in  England ;  in 
France 13-25 

CHAPTER  III. 

Punishments  and  gibbeting  in  Germany ;  in 
England,  in  seventeenth  century  ;  in  Scot- 
land,— Treason  and  Chains.  The  Gibbet 
in  France ;  Fourches  Patibulaires  of 
Montfaucon,  —  La  Grande  Justice, — 
description  of ;  mode  of  operation  ;  allu- 
sions to  in  early  poetry ;  Gibbet  of 
Montigny  ;  Gibbeting  of  animals       ...     26-41 

CHAPTER  IV. 

The  Gallows  and  Gibbet  in  Spain.     Gibbeting 

of  animals  in  Holland  42-48 

CHAPTER  V. 

The  "  Pilgrim's  Progress."  Entry  of  Charles  V. 
into  Douai.  Punishment  of  women  in 
England ;  in  France.  Examples  of 
Hangings  in  Chains,  1671—1717         ...     49~59 


TABLE  OF  CONTENTS.  xi 

CHAPTER  VI. 

PAGE 

Piracy,  1725.  Sir  Walter  Scott.  "  Standing 
Mute."  Squeezing  the  Thumbs.  Peine 
forte  et  dure,  example  of,  1674.  The 
Rack.  Burning  alive.  High  Treason, — 
defined.  Petition  for  Hanging  in  Chains. 
Examples  of  Gibbeting,  1742,  175 1.  The 
Smugglers  ;  death  from  horror  of  irons. 
Witchcraft  60-69 

CHAPTER  VII. 

Gibbeting  in  Chains  first  legally  recognized, 
1752 ;  but  not  part  of  the  sentence. 
Roman  law  concerning  Gibbeting.  Its 
rapid  increase  in  England.  Terror  at 
prospect  of  Gibbet  and  Chains.  Prepa- 
ration and  treatment  of  the  body.  Effect 
of  Gibbeting  on  spectators  and  traffic. 
Hogarth.  Thames  Pirates  gibbeted, — 
attraction  for  holiday-makers.  Behaviour 
at  Northampton  70-77 

CHAPTER  VIII. 

Examples  of  Hangings  in  Chains,  1 752-1 777. 
Jemmy  Dawson.  Double  Gibbet, — Mr. 
Kerrich's  sketches.  Robbing  the  mail, 
— triple  gibbet.  Robbing  the  mail  and 
gibbeting,  1788 ;  Robbing  the  mail  and 
murdering  the  post-boy,  and  gibbeting. 
Double  Gibbet,  1796.  Robbing  the  mail 
and  hanging  in  irons,  1799      78-86 


xii  TABLE  OF  CONTENTS. 

CHAPTER  IX. 


PAGE 


Bewick's  illustrations  of  the  Gibbet  ...     87-92 

CHAPTER  X. 

Example  of  Hanging  in  Chains,  1800.  Tradi- 
tion of  Hanging  alive  in  Chains, — Holling- 
shed,  Chettle, — considered,  and  set  aside. 
Ambrose  Gwinnett,  1709.  Hanging, 
Boiling,  and  Quartering  93-101 

CHAPTER  XI. 

Example  of  Hanging  in  Chains,  1808.  Gibbet 
riddle.  Spence  Broughton.  Hanging  in 
Chains  at  Malta.  A  Hand  gibbeted. 
Supposed  Gibbeting  alive  in  Bengal,  and 
in  Jamaica.  The  Chapter  House  at  Lin- 
coln a  criminal  court,  1827  ;  the  gibbeting 
remitted.  Example  in  1832  ;  severance 
of  last  personal  link  with  the  Gibbet  (April 
14,  1891).  Last  example  of  Hanging  in 
Chains,  1834.  Its  abolition  by  Statute. 
Gibbet  with  Wooden  Head,  in  memoriam. 
Conclusion. — The  Halifax  Gibbet ...     102-114 


Xlll 


LIST   OF   GIBBETING   IRONS   AND 
CHAINS. 

Ashmolean  Museum.— Eight  separate  portions  of 
Irons  found  in  various  parts  of  Oxford.  Some 
have  cylindrical  padlocks  attached  to  them. 

Chester  Museum. — A  leg-piece. 

Doddington  Hall,  Lincoln. — Parts  of  Tommy 
Otter's  Irons.     See  p.  104. 

Leicester  Gaol. — Cook's  Irons.     See  p.  in. 

Norwich  Gaol. — Watson's  Irons.     See  p.  94. 

Norwich  Museum. — A  Head-piece. 

Preston. — Irons. 

Rye,  Court  Hall. — Breeds's  Irons.  See  p.  66. 
Illustrated. 

Skegness  Museum. — Irons. 

Warrington  Museum. — Miles's  Irons.  See  p.  85. 
Illustrated. 

Winchester. — I  rons. 

In  the  possession  of  Lady  Dorothy  Nevill. — A  leg- 
piece  of  Carter's  Irons.     See  p.  68. 

In  the  possession  of  the  Rev.  J.  W.  Tottenham. — 
Two  sets  of  Pirate's  Chains  from  the  Thames. 
See  p.  75.     Illustrated. 


LIST  OF  ILLUSTRATIONS. 


i.  Pirate's  Chains  from  the 

Thames Frontispiece 

2.  Decapitation  \ 

3.  Impalement  >  Facing  page  2d 

4.  Burning  at  the  Stake  . . .  / 

5.  Gibbet  of  Montfaucon    ...  „         34 

6.  Breeds's  Irons   „         66 

7.  A  Thames  Pirate  „         76 

8.  Gibbet  on  Brandon  Sands  „         82 

9.  Miles's  Irons  „         85 

10.  Gibbet  from  Bewick    „         91 

11.  Iron  Cage  from  Bengal...  „        106 


HANGING    IN    CHAINS. 


Cfiaptet  i. 

O  rest  at  last  in  the  ground, 
to  be  buried  in  the  sepul- 
chre of  their  fathers,  was 
accounted  by  the  Jews  as 
the  greatest  honour  and  happiness,  and 
throughout  the  Old  Testament  the  ex- 
pression for  death  is  sleeping,  implying 
lying  tranquil  and  undisturbed.  Thus 
David,  Azariah,  and  Jotham  "  slept  with 
their  fathers,  and  were  buried  in  the 
city  of  David" — "  for  so  He  giveth 
His  beloved  sleep."  I 


1  Psa.  cxxvii.  2. 
2 


2  HANGING  IN  CHAINS. 

On  the  other  hand,  to  die  an  un- 
natural or  violent  death,  to  be  cast 
out  of  the  grave  like  an  abominable 
branch,  to  be  as  a  carcass  exposed  in 
the  sight  of  the  sun,  or  trodden  under 
foot,  and  not  to  be  joined  with  their 
fathers  in  burial,  was  ever  esteemed  a 
note  of  infamy,  and  a  kind  of  curse. 
1  'And  if  a  man  have  committed  a  sin 
worthy  of  death,  and  he  be  to  be 
put  to  death,  and  thou  hang  him  on  a 
tree  :  his  body  shall  not  remain  all 
night  upon  the  tree,  but  thou  shalt  in 
any  wise  bury  him  that  day  (for  he 
that  is  hanged  is  accursed  of  God)  ; 
that  thy  land  be  not  defiled."  I  So 
Jehoiakim  was  threatened  with  the 
want  of  even  ordinary  burial,  and  to 
be  cast  out  like  carrion  into  some 
remote  and  sordid  place.  It  was  a 
severe  sentence,  "  He  shall  be  buried 

1  Deut.  xxi.  22,  23. 


HANGING  IN  CHAINS.  3 

with  the  burial  of  an  ass,  drawn  and 
cast  forth  beyond  the  gates  of  Jeru- 
salem." 1 

Again,  Jeremiah  foretelling  the 
desolation  of  the  Jews,  "  Their 
carcasses  will  I  give  to  be  meat  for 
the  fowls  of  the  heaven,  and  for  the 
beasts  of  the  earth,"  2  "  and  no  man 
shall  fray  them  away ; "  3  and  in 
another  place  we  are  told  that  their 
bones  shall  be  "  spread  before  the 
sun,  and  the  moon,  and  all  the  host 
of  heaven,  .  .  .  they  shall  not  be 
gathered,  nor  be  buried."  4 

In  the  denunciation  of  Jehoiakim, 
in  that  picturesque  and  striking  scene, 
when  the  king  burnt  the  roll  of 
Baruch,  it  is  recorded  against  him  : 
"  His  dead  body  shall  be  cast  out 
in   the    day  to   the  heat,  and  in  the 


1  Jer.  xxii.  19.  2  Jer.  xix.  7. 

3  Peut.  xxviii.  26.  4  Jer.  viii,  2, 


4  HANGING  IN  CHAINS. 

night  to  the  frost."  1  So  great, 
indeed,  was  the  dread  among  the 
ancient  Jews  that  the  dead  body 
should  be  treated  with  derision  or 
contumely,  that  the  Preacher  ex- 
pressed and  summed  up  the  general 
sentiment  in  these  words  :  "  If  a  man 
.  .  .  have  no  burial,  I  say  that  an 
untimely  birth  is  better  than  he."  2 

As  with  the  Jews  so  it  was  with 
the  Egyptians.  They  refused  burial 
to  executed  criminals  and  gave  their 
bodies  to  the  birds  and  beasts.  For 
instance,  Joseph  said  to  the  chief 
baker,  "  Yet  within  three  days  shall 
Pharaoh  lift  up  thine  head  from  off 
thee,  and  shall  hang  thee  on  a  tree  ; 
and  the  birds  shall  eat  thy  flesh  from 
off  thee."  3     And  so  it  came  to  pass. 

We   may   gather,    again,   from  the 


Jer.  xxxvi.  30.  2  Eccles.  vi.  3. 

3  Gen.  xl.  19. 


HANGING  IN  CHAINS.  5 

short  and  touching  story  of  the  long 
watches  of  Rizpah,  how  deep  was  the 
solicitude  that  the  dead  should  not  be 
polluted  by  birds  and  beasts,1  or  from 
the  ghastly  fate  of  Amasa,  whose 
mangled  corpse  was  covered  with  a 
cloth  by  a  mere  bystander — one  of 
Joab's  men  2 — in  order  that  the  people 
might  not  be  shocked  by  looking  upon 
it — how  strong  was  the  feeling  in 
those  days  against  the  wanton  expo- 
sure of  the  divine  image. 

It  would  be  easy  to  multiply 
examples  from  these  sources,  but 
with  further  regard  to  the  seven  sons 
of  Saul  it  may  be  mentioned  that 
"  the  victims  were  not,  as  the  Autho- 
rized Version  implies,  hung,  they 
were  crucified.  The  seven  crosses 
were  planted  in  the  rock  on  the 
top    of  the   sacred     hill   of    Gibeah. 

1  2  Sam.  xxi.  io.  2  2  Sam.  xx.  12. 


6  HANGING  IN  CHAINS. 

.  .  .  The  victims  were  sacrificed 
at  the  beginning  of  barley  harvest, 
— the  sacred  and  festal  time  of  the 
Passover — and  in  the  full  blaze  of 
the  summer  sun  they  hung  till  the 
fall  of  the  periodical  rain  in  October. 
.  .  .  She  spread  on  the  rocky  floor 
the  thick  mourning  garment  of  black 
sackcloth,  which  as  a  widow  she  wore, 
and  crouching  there  she  watched  that 
neither  vulture  nor  jackal  should 
molest  the  bodies."  ?  Thus  the 
practice  of  gibbeting  on  a  cross 
was  in  use  at  least  as  early  as  in 
the  days  of  King  David. 

The  misery  of  having  no  burial, 
of  rendering  neither  justice  to  the 
earth  nor  mercy  to  the  dead,  was 
recognized  by  the  refined  nature  of 
the  Greeks,  and,  while  they  refused 
decent  sepulture  to  infamous  persons 

1  Smith's  "Diet,  of  the  Bible,"  s.v.  Rizpah. 


HANGING  IN  CHAINS.  7 

and  prisoners,  they  yearned  both  in 

peace  and  war  for  quiet  burial  in  the 

ground,   for   they  were  dismayed   at 

the  thought  of  burial  at  sea.1 

Thus   Mezentius,  in  the  iEneid  of 

Virgil,  asks  not  ^neas  to  spare  his 

life, 

"  but  let  my  body  have 

The  last  retreat  of  human  kind,  a  grave."  2 

1  Of  justice,  in  that  earth  should  be  returned 
to  earth,  and  dust  to  dust,  for  what  could  be 
more  just  than  to  restore  to  mother  earth  her 
children,  .  .  .  that  she  might  at  last  receive 
them  again  into  her  bosom,  and  afford  them 
lodging  till  the  resurrection?  The  ancients 
also  thought  it  an  act  of  mercy  to  hide  the 
dead  in  the  earth,  that  the  organs  of  such 
divine  souls  might  not  be  torn  and  devoured  by 
wild  beasts,  birds,  &c.  T.  Greenhill,  "nekpo- 
khaeia,"  p.  33. 

2  Dryden's  "Translation" — iEneid,  lib.  ix. 
v.  901. 

Nullum  in  coede  nefas  nee  sic  ad  prcelia  veni 
Nee   tecum   meus    hsec    pepigit   mihi   fcedera 

Lausus 
Unum  hoc,  per,  si  qua  est  victis  venia  hostibus 

oro ; 


8  HANGING  IN  CHAINS. 

And  Turnus — 

"  Or  if  thy  vowed  revenge  pursue  my  death, 
Give  to  my  friends  my  body  void  of  breath."1 

And,  to  take  another  and  a  notable 
example,  Hector,  in  his  last  hour, 
beseeched  Achilles  to  take  the 
ransom  and  suffer  not  his  body  to 
be  devoured  by  the  dogs  of  the 
Greeks,  but  to  let  the  sons  and 
daughters  of  Troy  give  him  burial 
rites.2 

Corpus  humo  patiare  tegi :  scio  acerba  meorum 
Circumstare  odia :  hunc,  oro,  defende  furorem, 
Et  me  consortem  nati  concede  sepulchro. 

1  Dryden's  "  Translation  " — iEneid,  lib.  xii. 

v.  935- 

Et  me,  seu  corpus  spoliatum  lumine  mavis, 

Redde  meis. 

2  Tbv  d'  okiyofipavkiov  7rpo(F£(pr)  KopvOaloXog'EicroJp' 
Maao/x'  virep  \pvxyg,  icai  yovvuiv,  aojv  re  tokijiov, 
Mr)  pa,  'ia  irapa  vi]vai  Kvvag  Karaddipai  'Axaiwv' 
'AXXd  av  p.ev  xciXkov  re  liXig  xpvoov  re  dede^o, 
Autpa,  rd  rot  Suhjovgi  7rar>)p  ical  ttotvui  pr']ri]p' 
"Zujfxa  8a  ditcatf  epbv  dopevai  7rd\iv,  6(ppa  nvpog  pe. 
TpuJtg  icai  Tpibiov  dXoxoi  Xe\a%wai  Bavovra. 

—Horn.  II.  xxii.  337-343- 


HANGING  IN  CHAINS.  9 

It  is  said  that  a  certain  Achaeus, 
who  disputed  sovereign  power  with 
Antiochus,  was  betrayed  by  a  Cretan, 
his  limbs  cut  off,  and  his  body 
wrapped  in  the  skin  of  an  ass,  and 
exposed  on  a  gibbet. 

Pliny,  in  his  "  Natural  History,"  l 
tells  us  that  Tarquinius  Priscus,  who 
died  578  B.C.,  ordered  the  dead  bodies 
of  suicides  to  be  exposed  on  a  cross. 
He  was  a  powerful  ruler,  and  an 
Etruscan,  and  made  his  mark  on 
Rome.  He  came  from  Etruria  when 
it  was  in  a  high  state  of  development, 
and,  no  doubt,  the  practice  of  gibbet- 
ing on  a  cross  was  early  in  use  with 
that  ancient  and  gifted  race. 

The  Romans  dreaded  the  public 
exposure  of  their  bodies,  and  ship- 
wreck, no  less  than  did  the  Greeks  ; 
thus  Ovid — 

*  Lib.  36,  cap.  15. 


io  HANGING  IN  CHAINS. 

"  I  fear  not  death,  nor  value  how  I  die ; 
Free  me  from  seas,  no  matter  where  I  lie. 
'Tis  somewhat,  howsoe'er  one's  breath  depart, 
In  solid  earth  to  lay  one's  meaner  part ; 
'Tis  somewhat  after  death  to  gain  a  grave, 
And  not  be  food  to  fish,  or  sport  to  every 
wave."  J 

They  refused  sepulture  to  suicides, 
for  they  thought  it  unreasonable  that 
any  hands  should  bury  him  whose 
own  had  destroyed  himself,  and  they 
withheld  decent  burial  from  criminals. 
Albertus  Leoninus,  from  the  Low 
Countries,  one  of  the  ablest  lawyers 
of  the  sixteenth  century,  says,  speak- 
ing of  the  Romans,  "  If  any  one  killed 
himself  his  body  was  cast  out  upon  a 


1  Non   lethum    timeo,  genus    aut    miserable 
lethi  : 
Demite  naufragium  ;  mors  mihi  munus  erit. 
Est  aliquid  fatove  suo,  ferrore  cadentem 
In  solida  moriens,  ponere  corpus  humo  : 
Est  mandata  suis  aliquid  sperare  sepulchra, 
Et  non  sequoreis  piscibus  esse  cibum. 


HANGING  IN  CHAINS.  ti 

dunghill  to  have  common  sepulture 
with  dogs,  &c;  but,  however,  it  was 
more  customary  to  have  his  goods 
confiscated,  and  his  body  hung  on  the 
ftircay  or  gibbet.  All  such  persons  as 
hung  upon  this  gibbet  were,  by  the 
laws,  denied  sepulture ;  and  a  sentry, 
says  Petronius,  was  set  to  watch  them, 
lest  anybody  should  come  by  night 
and  steal  them  away."  1  The  memor- 
able words,  "and  sitting  down  they 
watched  Him  there,"  cannot  fail  to 
occur  to  the  mind. 

Our  Saviour,  with  all  reverence  be 
it  said,  was  gibbeted — "  nail'd,  for  our 
advantage,  on  the  bitter  cross," 2 
and  it  was  not  until  long  after  that 
great  Sacrifice — perhaps  not  until  the 
fifth  century — that  the  cross  became 
the     generally    recognized    Christian 


1  Lew  Leew,  "  Process.  Criminal." 

2  King  Henry  IV.t  Act  i.  sc.  i. 


12  HANGING  IN  CHAINS. 

sign,  and  gradually  took  the  place  of 
the  Chi  Rho  %  emblem. 

The  number  of  Saints  who  suffered, 
and  were  exposed  upon  the  cross 
or  gibbet,  is  larger  than  that  of 
those  who  died  the  death  in  any 
other  way.  Saint  Ferreolus,  martyred 
in  212,  is  shown  in  "  Die  Iconogra- 
phie  der  Heiligen"  with  a  gibbet 
proper  near  him  ;  Saint  Anastatius, 
martyred  in  628,  is  represented  in  a 
fresco  in  the  church  of  SS.  Vincent 
and  Anastatius,  in  Rome,  upon  a 
gibbet,  and  pierced  with  many  arrows ; 
and  the  martyr  Saint  Colman,  who 
suffered  in  the  year  1012,  is  shown 
in  "Das  Passional "  of  1480  hanging 
on  a  gibbet ;  in  "  Die  Attribute  der 
Heiligen"  he  stands  in  the  sclavine  of 
a  pilgrim,  with  a  rope  in  his  hand, 
indicating  the  manner  of  his  death.1 

1  Husenbeth,   "Emblems  of   Saints,"   edit. 
1882. 


Chapter  n. 


ENCE,  as  we  have  seen, 
gradually  arose,  side  by- 
side  with  thecapital  punish- 
ment of  hanging  on  the 
gallows  in  its  simplicity — which  may 
be  almost  said  to  be  as  old  as  the 
world  itself — the  custom  of  publicly 
exposing  human  bodies  upon  gibbets 
as  warnings  to  others. 

We  gather  from  the  "  Vocabulary 
of  Archbishop  Alfric,"  of  the  tenth 
century,  and  from  early  illuminated 
MSS.,  that  the  gallows  (galga)  was 
the  usual  mode  of  capital  punishment 
with  the  Anglo-Saxons.  It  can  hardly 
be  doubted  that  in  certain  cases,  as  with 


14  HANGING  IN  CHAINS. 

the  Romans,  the  body  of  the  u  for- 
demed  " — in  the  case  of  decapitation 
the  "  heafedleas  bodi  " — remained  in 
terrorem  upon  the  gibbet,  as  Robert 
of  Gloucester,  circa  1280,  has  it, 
referring  to  his  own  times  : — 

"  In  gibet  hii  were  an  honge," 

though  not  necessarily  as  part  of  the 
sentence,  as  appears  always  to  have 
been  the  case  in  England.  An 
obscure  poet,  Robert  Brunne,  has : — 

(l  First  was  he  drawen  for  his  felonie, 
&  as  a  thefe  than  on  galwes  hanged  hie." 

In  the  numerous  enactments  con- 
cerning the  administration  of  the 
criminal  law,  from  the  "  Statute  of 
Westminster  the  First,"  in  1277,  to  the 
Act  of  George  II.  in  1752,  no  cogniz- 
ance is  taken  of  the  hanging  of  bodies 
of  criminals  in  chains.  Such  a  treat- 
ment of  the  carcass  was,  like  the  rack, 
rather  an  engine  of  state  than  of  law. 


HANGING  IN  CHAINS.  15 

In  Chauncy's  "  History  of  Hert- 
fordshire. "  it  is  stated  : — - 

"  Soon  after  the  King  came  to 
Easthampstead,  to  recreate  himself 
with  hunting,  where  he  heard  that 
the  bodies  which  were  hanged  here 
were  taken  down  from  the  gallowes, 
and  removed  a  great  way  from  the 
same  ;  this  so  incensed  the  King  that 
he  sent  a  writ,  tested  the  3rd  of 
August,  Anno  1381,  to  the  bailiffs  of 
this  borrough,  commanding  them  upon 
sight  thereof,  to  cause  chains  to  be 
made,  and  to  hang  the  bodies  in 
them  upon  the  same  gallowes,  there  to 
remain  so  long  as  one  piece  might 
stick  to  another,  according  to  the 
judgement  ;  but  the  townsmen,  not 
daring  to  disobey  the  King's  com- 
mand, hanged  the  dead  bodies  of 
their  neighbours  again,  to  their  great 
shame  and  reproach,  when  they  could 
not  get  any  other  for  any  wages  to 


1 6  HANGING  IN  CHAINS. 

come  near  the  stinking  carcasses,  but 
they  themselves  were  compelled  to 
do  so  vile  an  office." 

This  is  an  early  record  of  a  judg- 
ment to  hang  in  terrorem,  and  of 
chains  for  the  purpose.1 

Gower,  a  contemporary  poet,  says : — 

11  And  so  after  by  the  Lawe 
He  was  into  the  gibbet  drawe, 
Where  he  above  all  other  hongeth, 
As  to  a  traitor  it  belongeth." 

Again,  during  the  second  Northern 
Rising,  in  1536,  the  Duke  of  Norfolk 
hung  and  quartered,  as  the  usual 
punishment  for  high  treason,  seventy- 
four  men  at  Carlisle,  but  the  bodies 
of  Sir  Robert  Constable  and  Ashe 
were  hung  in  chains  at  Hull  and  York 
respectively,  as  special  cases.  And 
the  Duke  blames  the  Earl  of  Cumber- 

1  Chauncy,  "  History  of  Hertfordshire,"  vol. 
ii.  p.  274. 


HANGING  IN  CHAINS.  17 

land  for  not  having  hung  certain 
persons  in  chains,  as  he  had  directed ; 
he  airily  adds,  speaking  of  other 
examples  in  Yorkshire,  that  "they 
all  hang  still  in  chains,  notwithstand- 
ing that  I  have  had  no  small  inter- 
cession for  many  of  them."  l 

We  gather  from  these  items  that, 
although  the  public  exposure  of  the 
body  entire  formed  no  legal  part  of 
the  punishment  for  high  treason,  it 
was  sometimes  added  to  it  for  the 
increase  of  the  shame.  Whether  the 
ensanguined,  quivering  quarter  of  a 
man,  uplifted  high  on  a  gateway,  had 
a  more  deterrent  effect  than  a  whole 
body  slowly  wasting  away  in  chains, 
we  are,  fortunately,  not  now  called 
upon  curiously  to  determine. 

It  may  here  be  mentioned  that  the 


1  F.    A.    Gasquet,    "Henry   VIII.    and    the 

Monasteries,"  vol.  ii.  p.  164. 


1 8  HANGING  IN  CHAINS. 

punishment  for  high  treason  differs  in 
one  important  particular  from  that  for 
murder.  The  head  must  be  severed 
from  the  body  after  the  hanging. 
The  man  must  be  drawn  to  the 
gallows,  and  may  not  walk ;  he  must 
be  cut  down  alive  ;  his  entrails  taken 
out  and  burnt  before  his  face.  Then 
the  head  cut  off — "  headed,"  and 
finally  the  body  quartered,  and  the 
head  and  quarters  remaining  at  the 
king's  disposal.  This  was  the  English 
law,  as  finally  settled  by  the  Statute 
of  Treason  of  25  Edward  III.  (135 1). 
Such  a  sentence  had  been  first  carried 
out,  as  it  appears,  upon  a  pirate  named 
William  Marise,  in  1241.  Notable 
examples  are  those  of  Wallace,  1 305  ; l 

1  The  Chancellor's  Roll  states  that  the  cost 
of  Wallace's  execution,  and  transmitting  the 
quarters  to  Scotland,  was  6 is.  iod.  "  He  was 
take  and  broute  onto  London,  hanged,  and 
drawn,  and  quartered  ;  his  hed  sette  on  London 


HANGING  IN  CHAINS.  19 

the  elder  and  the  younger  Despencers, 
1326  j1    Hotspur,    1403  ;2    and   they 

brigge ;  his  body  dyvyded  in  iiij  quarteres  and 
sent  to  foure  tounes  in  Scotland "  (Capgrave's 
"Chronicles").  Wallace  was  hung,  cut  down 
alive,  opened,  his  bowels,  &c,  burnt,  beheaded, 
and  finally  quartered.  Newcastle  had  his  brave 
right  arm,  the  left  went  to  Berwick,  Perth 
received  the  right  leg,  and  Aberdeen  the  left. 
Thus  the  patriot  was  broken  up. 

1  "  Enormiter,  pertitiose,  et  crudeliter,  sine 
judicio  et  responsione,  suspensus,  distractus,  et 
in  quatuor  partes  divisus  fuit ;  et  in  nostra 
ecclesia  diu  postea  sepultus"  (Tewkesbury 
Register). 

2  The  battle  of  Shrewsbury  was  fought  July 
21,  1403,  and  the  four  quarters  of  Hotspur  were 
divided  between  London,  Shrewsbury,  Chester, 
and  Newcastle.  York  had  the  head.  Four 
months  later,  namely,  November  3rd.,  a  writ  was 
directed  to  the  mayor  and  sheriffs  of  York,  as 
follows  : — 

"  The  King  to  the  Mayor  and  Sheriffs  of  the 
city  of  York,  greeting. — Whereas  of  our  special 
grace  we  have  granted  to  our  Cousin  Elizabeth, 
who  was  the  wife  of  Henry  de  Percy,  Chivalier, 
the  head  and  quarters  of  the  same  Henry  to  be 
buried  :  We  command  you  that  the  head  afore- 


20  HANGING  IN  CHAINS. 

are  notable  examples  of  shocking 
barbarity ;  and  not  least  memorable 
though,   happily,  last,   the  executions 


said,  placed  by  our  command  upon  the  gate  of 
the  city  aforesaid,  you  deliver  to  the  same 
Elizabeth,  to  be  buried  according  to  our  grant 
aforesaid.  Witness  the  king  at  Cirencester,  this 
3rd  day  of  November." 

By  writ  of  Privy  Seal : — 

"The  King  to  the  Mayor  and  Sheriff  of  the 
town  of  Newcastle-on-Tyne,  greeting. — Whereas 
(&c,  &c,  as  above)  you  deliver  to  the  said 
Elizabeth  a  certain  quarter  of  the  said  Henry 
placed  upon  the  gate  "  (&c,  &c,  as  above). 

Similar  writs  were  directed  to  the  Mayor  and 
Bailiffs  of  Chester,  and  to  the  authorities  at 
Shrewsbury  for  other  several  quarters  of  the 
same  Henry,  and  to  the  Abbot  of  Shrewsbury  a 
writ  was  addressed  directing  him  to  bury  the 
body  of  Hotspur,  thus  again  brought  together, 
in  his  church  of  St.  Peter  at  Shrewsbury.  The 
fourth  quarter,  that  sent  to  distant  London,  does 
not  appear  to  have  been  forthcoming,  for  reasons 
which  will  be  apparent.  See  Rev.  C.  H. 
Hartshorne's  "  Feudal  and  Military  Antiquities 
of  Northumberland  and  the  Scottish  Borders," 
p.  296. 


HANGING  IN  CHAINS.  21 

after  "  the  — 45,"  in  exact  accordance 
with  the  ancient  statute  of  four  cen- 
turies before.  It  is  recorded  that  one 
of  these  last  victims  struggled  for  a 
few  moments  with  William  Stout  of 
Hexham,  the  fiend  who,  for  twenty 
guineas  and  the  clothes,  did  the  bloody 
business,  when  he  opened  his  bosom 
and  plucked  out  his  heart.1  It  is  a 
dreadful  subject,  which  one  almost 
shrinks  from  touching  ;  but  it  may  be 
added  that  none  of  the  thirty-two 
sufferers  at  Carlisle  for  "the  — 45  " 
were  hung  in  chains ;  they  died  the 
ferocious  death  for  high  treason.2 

1  "  History  of  Penrith,"  1858,  p.  95. 

2  The  total  number  arraigned  was  382  ;  by  lot 
this  was  reduced  to  127,  the  total  number  con- 
demned to  death  being  86.  Lords  Balmerino 
and  Kilmarnock  were  beheaded  for  "  the  — 45," 
August  18,  1746.  They  behaved  with  much 
dignity  and  fortitude.  The  former  expressed 
his  wish  to  Lord  Kilmarnock,  just  before  the 
execution,  that  he  wished  he  could  suffer  for 


22  HANGING  IN  CHAINS. 

As  a  curiously  mitigated  example 
we  may  mention  the  case  of  the  five 
gentlemen  attached  to  the  Duke  of 
Gloucester,  who  were  arraigned  and 
condemned  for  treason  in  1447.  They 
were  hung  and  immediately  cut  down 
alive,  stripped  naked,  their  bodies 
marked  for  quartering,  and  then,  no 
doubt  very  much  to  their  surprise, 
pardoned. 

In  Jersey,  during  the  administration 
of  the  Duke  of  Somerset,  uncle  of 
Edward  VI.,  two  pirates  were  con- 
demned and  hung  in  chains,  as  appears 


them  both ;  noblesse  oblige,  even  on  the  scaffold. 
By  their  particular  request  their  heads  were  not 
severally  held  up  and  exposed  by  the  executioner 
with  the  usual  formula — "This  is  the  head  of  a 
traitor."  But  the  sheriffs  directed  that  every- 
body on  the  scaffold  should  kneel  down,  so  that 
the  people  might  see  the  execution  itself  per- 
formed— a  ceremony  never  practised  before. 
("  Account  of  the  Behaviour,"  &c,  by  T.  Forde, 
a  gentleman  then  present,  1746.) 


HANGING  IN  CHAINS.  23 

from  the  following  extract  from  the 
registers  of  the  island  : — 

"  Placita  Catallia  cum  justicia  reallis 
ten'  die  xviij°  Mensis  Januarii  An'o 
Domini  Mille°  quinm°  1°  coram  Ballj 
in  p'na  Clement  Lemp're,  Jo'his  de 
Carteret,  Ricardi  Dumaresq,  Nicoll' 
Lemp're,  Jo'his  Lemp're,  Edwardii 
Dumaresq,  Edwardii  de  Carteret, 
Laurentii  Hamptoune,  Georgii  de 
Carteret,   Jo'his  de  Soullemont. 

"  John  Wyte,  Bernabe  Le  Quesne, 
Sebastian  Alexandre,  criminels  pour 
leur  demerites  de  cas  de  crime  pirates 
et  larons  de  mer  accordant  leur  con- 
fessions sont  condampnes  a  estre 
pendus  et  estrangles  de  cy  a  ce  que 
mort  en  ensuyve  savoir  est  ledit  John 
Wyte  sur  une  potence  hault  eslevee  a 
la  pointe  de  devers  Ste  Katherine  et 
ledit  Bernabey  Le  Quesne  sur  une 
potence  hault  elevee  p'eillement  sur  le 
bee  et  pointe  de  Noirmont  aux  lieux 


24  HANGING  IN  CHAINS. 

les  plus  eminens  desdites  Montaignes 
et  la  leurs  corps  demeurer  enchaines 
por  y  estre  consumes  et  pourrys,  et  le 
dit  Sebastien  est  respite  par  certaines 
considerations  prises  et  considerees  en 
Justice,  et  tos  leurs  biens  meubles  et 
heritages  confisques  en  la  maison  du 
Roi  ou  des  Seigneurs  aux  q'ls  il 
app'tiennent "  (Cour  du  Catel).1 

In  Hakluyt's  "  Voyages  "  we  find 
the  following  :  —  "  Hereupon  the 
souldiers  besought  me  not  to  hang 
them,  but  rather  let  them  be  shot 
throw,  and  then  afterwards,  if  I 
thought  good,  their  bodies  might  be 
hanged  upon  gibbets  along  the 
haven's    mouth."  2 

The  numerous  allusions  to  gibbets 
by  Shakespeare  show  how  common 
they  were  in  his  day. 

1  De  la  Croix,   "  Jersey,  Ses  Antiquites,  Ses 
Institutions,  Son  Histoire,"  vol.  iii.  pp.  342,  343. 

2  Hakluyt,  "  Voyages,"  vol.  iii.  p.  336. 


HANGING  IN  CHAINS.  25 

It  will  have  been  observed  in  the 
foregoing  remarks  that  the  words 
"gallows"  and  "  gibbet"  have  been 
used  indifferently  in  the  quotations 
both  for  hanging  a  man  from,  and  for 
exposing  him  upon.  It  would  appear 
that,  at  least  with  us  at  the  present 
day,  gallows  is  the  thing  upon 
which  men  suffer,  and  gibbet  the 
object  upon  which  they  are  set  forth. 
Hence  the  expression  to  gibbet  a 
man  by  calling  attention  publicly  to 
nefarious  deeds,  and,  as  the  one  thing 
has  given  us  the  verb,  so  the  other 
furnishes  the  language  with  an  adjec- 
tive equally  expressive,  and  a  person 
by  his  "gallous"  conduct  stands  a 
fair  chance  of  reaching  the  gallows 
at  last.  A  gallows  may  by  particular 
use  become  a  gibbet,  but  not  con- 
trariwise, and  the  same  remark  may 
be  said  to  apply  to  Potence  and 
Gibbet. 

3 


Cfmpter  in. 


HILST  such  horrors  were 
going  on  in  England  we 
may  be  sure  that  the 
Germans,  with  their 
dogged  brutality,  were  not  behind- 
hand. With  them  the  bodies  of 
traitors  and  highwaymen,  as  well  as 
of  murderers,  were  fixed  upon  poles, 
set  upon  wheels,  impaled  alive,  or  hung 
upon  gibbets.  Three  prints  from  "La 
Cosmographie  Universelle  de  Mun- 
ster,"  1552,  give  some  notion  of  the 
sternness  of  the  Teutonic  penal  code. 
The  last  instance  of  burning  at  the 


DECAPITATION. 

{Facsimile  of  an  original  woodcut  in  "  La  Cosmografhie 
unirerselle  de  Miinster"  1 552* ) 


IMPALEMENT. 

[Facsimile  of  an  original  woodcut  in  "  La  Cosmographie 
universelle  de  Miinster"  1552.)] 


BURNING   AT   THE   STAKE. 

{Facsimile  of  an  original  woodcut  in  "  La  Cosmographit 
universelle  de  Miinster"  1552.) 


HANGING  IN  CHAINS.  27 

stake  in  Germany  occurred  at  Berlin, 
Aug.  18,  1786.  It  was  then  seventy 
years  since  a  similar  punishment  had 
been  carried  out  in  the  Prussian 
capital.  The  criminal,  stripped  to  his 
shirt,  was  enclosed  in  a  cage-like  frame 
which  fastened  with  a  door,  and  was 
surrounded  with  wood  and  straw. 

The  last  example  of  breaking  on 
the  wheel  was  carried  out  at  Vienna 
in  the  above-mentioned  year.  The 
victim  was  tortured  with  red-hot 
pincers — tenaille — as  he  walked  to  the 
place  of  execution. 

Weever,  writing  in  1631,  says: — 

"  Hee  that  commits  treason,  is 
adjudged  by  our  Lawes,  to  be  hanged, 
drawne,  and  quartered,  and  his  diuided 
limbes  to  be  set  vpon  poles  in  some 
eminent  place,  within  some  great 
Market-towne,  or  Citie. 

"  He  that  commits  that  crying 
sinne   of   murther,  is  vsually  hanged 


28  HANGING  IN  CHAINS. 

vp  in  chaines,  so  to  continue  vntill 
his  bodie  be  consumed,  at  or  near 
the  place  where  the  fact  was  perpe- 
trated. 

"  Such  as  are  found  guilty  of  other 
criminall  causes,  as  Burglarie,  Felonie, 
or  the  like,  after  a  little  hanging  are 
cut  downe  and  indeed  buried,  but 
seldom  in  Christian  mould  (as  we  say) 
nor  in  the  sepulchres  of  their  fathers, 
except  their  fathers  have  their  graves 
made  neare,  or  vnder  the  gallowes. 

"  And  we  vse  to  bury  such  as  lay 
violent  hands  vpon  themselues,  in  or 
neare  to  the  high  wayes,  with  a  stake 
thrust  through  their  bodies,  to  terrifie 
all  passengers,  by  that  so  infamous 
and  reproachfull  a  buriall ;  not  to 
make  such  their  finall  passage  out  of 
this  present  world."1 


1  Weever,    "  Ancient   Funeral   Monuments," 
p.  22,  edit.  1631. 


HANGING  IN  CHAINS.  29 

It  is  important  to  notice,  as  regards 
hanging  in  chains,  that  Weever  says 
"  vsually,"  not  "  always;"  and  al- 
though in  the  preceding  paragraph, 
when  speaking  of  treason,  he  says  the 
punishment  for  it  "  is  adjudged  by 
our  Lawes,"  he  makes  no  such  remark 
now,  but  is  significantly  silent  as  to 
the  legal  nature  of  chains  ;  but,  from 
the  way  Weever  puts  it,  it  must  have 
been  a  common  practice  at  that  time 
in  England. 

In  Scotland,  Lord  Dreghorn,  writ- 
ing in  1774,  says,  "  The  first  instance 
of  hanging  in  chains  is  in  March, 
1637,  in  the  case  of  Macgregor,  for 
theft,  robbery,  and  slaughter ;  he  was 
sentenced  to  be  hanged  in  a  chenzie 
on  the  gallowlee  till  his  corpse 
rot."  * 


1  M'Laurin   (Lord   Dreghorn),    "Arguments 
and  Decisions,"  &c,  Edinburgh,  1774. 


30  HANGING  IN  CHAINS. 

In  1688  one  Standsfield,  found  guilty 
of  treason  for  cursing  his  father,  and 
accession  to  his  father's  murder,  was 
sentenced  to  be  hung  at  the  Mercat 
Cross  till  he  was  dead,  his  tongue  to 
be  cut  out  and  burnt  upon  a  scaffold, 
his  right  hand  to  be  cut  off  and  affixed 
on  the  East  Port  of  Haddington,  and 
his  body  to  be  carried — not  drawn — 
to  the  gallowlee  between  Leith  and 
Edinburgh,  "  and  there  to  be  hanged 
in  chains,  and  his  name,  fame,  memory, 
and  honours  to  be  extinct,  and  his 
arms  to  be  riven  forth  and  delet  out 
of  the  books  of  arms."  I  Thus  the 
hanging  in  chains  formed  part  of  the 
sentence  in  Scotland  which  it  never 
did  in  England  for  any  crime,  if  we 
except  the  solitary  instance  at  East- 
hampstead  in  1381.2 


1  See    "Trial   of    Philip    Standsfield,"    &c, 
Edinburgh,  1688.  2  Seep.  15. 


HANGING  IN  CHAINS.  31 

We  may  now  pass  for  a  short  time 
to  France.  In  that  country  the 
gallows  was  a  feudal  right  which, 
held  in  the  first  place  in  capite,  could 
be  sub-infeudated  to  lesser  vassals, 
but  they  could  at  any  time  be  sup- 
pressed by  the  Crown.1  Voltaire,  at 
Ferney,  had  several  gallows  oxpotences, 
and  his  reassuring  speech  about  them 
to  his  friends  was,  "  I  have  as  many 
gallows  as  would  suffice  to  hang  half 
the  monarchs  in  Europe,  and  half  the 
monarchs  in  Europe  deserve  no  loftier 
position." 

Charles  V.  (1380 — 1422)  granted 
leave  to  certain  districts  to  have 
gal  1  o ws — -fo urches  patibula ires — w i t h 
two  posts,  and  a  curious  question 
arose  in  consequence  of  the  Count 
of  Rhodez  having  placed  his  armorial 


1  Viollet   le   Due,    "  Dictionnaire   raisonne,' 
tome  v.  p.  553,  s.v.  Fourches  patibulaires. 


32  HANGING  IN  CHAINS 

bearings  upon  a  gibbet  of  this  kind 
against  the  prerogative  of  the  king ; 
it  was  an  abuse  of  privilege,  and 
implied  the  seizing  of  justice.  Such 
gibbets,  of  which  the  number  of  pillars, 
or,  if  of  wood,  posts,  varied  from  two 
to  eight,  according  to  the  quality  of 
the  lord,  were  used  both  to  hang 
criminals  from,  and  for  the  suspension, 
exposure,  or  gibbeting  of  the  bodies 
of  men  executed  elsewhere  upon  tem- 
porary gallows.  The  sites  of  these 
fourckes  patibulaires  are  recognizable 
at  the  present  day  by  the  names, 
"  La  Justice,"  "  La  grande  Justice," 
titles  corresponding  to  our  own  more 
humble  and  prosaic  terms,  "  Gibbet 
Hill,"  or  "  Gibbet  Field."  The  Eng- 
lish gibbets  have  never  assumed,  like 
those  in  France,  any  monumental 
character. 

It  is  certain  that  there  was  already 
at  the  end  of  the  twelfth  century  a  great 


HANGING  IN  CHAINS.  33 

monumental  gibbet  on  the  eminence 
of  Montfaucon,  between  the  faubourgs 
of  St.  Martin  and  the  Temple,  in 
Paris.  Sauval  gives  a  remarkable 
description  of  it  as  at  that  period, 
and,  although  he  does  not  give  his 
authorities  quite  in  the  way  English 
antiquaries  might  wish,  there  can  be 
no  doubt,  from  the  documents  of  the 
thirteenth  century,  that  the  monument 
was  as  Sauval  describes  it.  It  under- 
went extensive  repairs,  if  not  partial 
re-building,  in  1425,  when  forty-eight 
old  beams  were  replaced  by  new  ones. 
It  is  also  recorded  that  in  1466  "  at 
the  Great  Justice  of  Paris  were 
attached  and  nailed  fifty-two  iron 
chains  to  hang  and  strangle  the 
malefactors  who  have  been  and  shall 
be  sent  here  by  order  of  Justice." 
Eight  great  new  ladders  were  subse- 
quently added,  and  all  these  details 
are  corroborated  by  a  representation 


34  HANGING  IN  CHAINS. 

in  an  old  tapestry  at   the   Hotel    de 
Ville.i 

From  these  very  curious  records 
the  genius  of  Viollet  le  Due  has  pro- 
duced an  illustration  which  is  here 
reproduced.  It  will  speak  for  itself 
better  than  any  description,  and  it 
will  be  only  necessary  to  say  that  the 
fourth,  or  open  side,  allowed  access 
to  the  interior  by  a  broad  flight  of 
steps  leading  to  a  wide  platform  on 
what  may  be  called  the  first  floor, 
running  round  the  three  sides  of  the 
interior.  Upon  this  platform  the 
executioner,  with  his  ladders  and 
assistants,  performed  his  office. 

This  arrangement  enabled  the 
designer  of  the  building  to  form  a 
vault  in  the  centre,  lighted  by  a 
small  loop.      It    had    an  entrance,   or 


1  "  Comptes  et  Ordinaires  de  la  preVote  de 
Paris," 


GIBBET   OF    MOXTFAUCON. 

[From  Viollet  le  Djic,  "  Dictionnaire  raisonne") 


HANGING  IN  CHAINS.  35 

"  eye,"  in  the  crown,  at  the  crossing 
of  the  ribs,  through  which  were  swept 
from  time  to  time  the  bones  and 
fragments  that  fell  from  above,  the 
ossuarhiwiy  or  charnel-house,  being 
cleared  out,  as  necessity  dictated, 
through  a  doorway  level  with  the  out- 
side ground  on  the  further  or  sinister 
side  of  the  building.  It  must  have 
been  a  thing  quite  unique  in  the 
world,  somewhat  recalling  the  Towers 
of  Silence  of  the  Parsees. 

The  mode  of  operation  was  as 
follows  : — 

The  executioner,  in  his  rayed  and 
party-coloured  habit  of  red  and  yellow, 
mounted  the  ladder,  placed  opposite  a 
convenient  space,  backwards,  holding 
in  his  hand  the  slack  ends  of  three 
cords  placed  round  the  culprit's  neck  ; 
two  of  these  cords,  "les  tortouses," 
had  slip-knots.  The  wretch  under 
treatment  was  encouraged    to  follow 


36  HANGING  IN  CHAINS. 

"le  maistre  des  haultes  ceuvres/' 
driven  up  after  him — no  doubt  with 
blows  and  execrations,  according  to 
the  Gallic  fashion — and  drawn  forward 
by  him  by  means  of  the  third  cord, 
"  le  jet."  Arrived  at  the  proper 
height,  the  operator,  the  mediaeval 
"  Monsieur  de  Paris,"  rapidly  attached 
the  "  tortouses "  to  the  gallows,  or 
chain  pendent  from  it,  and,  twisting 
the  "jet"  firmly  round  his  arm,  by 
means  of  this,  and  the  action  of  his 
knee,  threw  the  culprit  off  the  ladder 
into  mid-air ;  the  knots  of  the  "  tor- 
touses "  ran  home,  and  the  man  was 
strangled.  The  executioner  then 
gripped  the  crossbeam,  and,  placing 
his  feet  in  the  loop  formed  by  the 
bound  hands  of  the  patient,  by  dint 
of  repeated  vigorous  shocks  terminated 
his  sufferings.1 

1  Lacroix,  "  Moeurs,  Usages,  et  Costumes  au 
Moyen  Age,"  &c,  "Penalite,"  p.  455. 


HANGING  IN  CHAINS.  37 

It  may  not  be  questioned  that  death 
under  the  circumstances  and  compli- 
cated conditions  above  described 
cannot  have  been  other  than  a  very- 
shocking  spectacle,  and  particularly 
when  it  is  noticed  from  the  arrange- 
ment of  the  chains  that  many  a  male- 
factor may  in  his  agony  have  broken 
loose  from  his  bonds,  and  clutched  and 
grappled  in  his  last  moments  with  a 
decaying  carcass  at  his  side. 

We  can  gather  a  further  idea  of  the 
strange  and  dismal  appearance  of  the 
Gibbet  of  Montfaucon,  if  we  consider 
that  the  quantity  of  bodies  attached 
to  it,  and  ceaselessly  renewed,  at- 
tracted thousands  of  carrion  birds  to 
the  spot.  But  that  its  hideous  aspect 
and  pestilential  surroundings  pre- 
vented not  the  establishment,  in  its 
immediate  vicinity,  of  places  of 
amusement  and  debauch,  one  would 
almost  have  been  slow  to  believe  were 


38  HANGING  IN  CHAINS. 

it  not  for  the  testimony  of  ancient 
poetry  : — 

"Pour  passer  temps  joyeusement, 
Raconter  vueil  une  repeue 
Qui  fut  faicte  subtillement 
Pres  Montfaulcon,  c'est  chose  sceiie, 

Tant  parlerent  du  bas  mestier, 
Qui  fut  conclud,  par  leur  facon, 
Qu'ils  yroyent,  ce  soir-la,  coucher 
Pres  le  gibet  de  Montfaulcon, 
Et  auroyent  pour  provision, 
Ung  paste  de  facon  subtile, 
Et  menroyent,  en  conclusion, 
Avec  eulx  chascun  une  fille."  * 

So  wrote  Villon — also  called  Corbeuil, 
— in  the  middle  of  the  fifteenth 
century.  We  shall  have  occasion, 
later  on,  to  show  that  human  nature 
on  the  hill  of  Montfaucon,  in  the 
darkness  of  the  Middle  Ages,  was  the 


1  "  La  Repeue  faicte  aupres  de  Montfaulcon." 
Poetry  attributed  to  Villon.  Edit.  Jannet,  p. 
292.     1854. 


HANGING  IN  CHAINS.  39 

same  as  human  nature  in  a  great 
English  midland  town  in  the  en- 
lightened nineteenth  century. 

Monsieur  de  Lavillegille  tells  us 
that  there  was  another  and  a  smaller 
gibbet,  not  far  from  Montfaucon, 
called  "Legibet  de  Montigny."1  This 
was  to  supply  the  place  of  the  great 
scarecrow,  when  the  latter  was  under 
repair,  because,  of  course,  Justice 
never  stands  still.  The  bodies  of 
men  decapitated,  quartered,  torn  to 
pieces  by  horses,  or  boiled,  were  hung 
up  in  sacks  of  sackcloth  or  leather ; 
such  as  committed  suicide  also,2  and 
lay  figures  of  persons  condemned  in 
contumaciam.  The  corpse  of  the 
great  Captain  Coligny,  who  was  killed 
in  the  massacre  of  St.  Bartholomew, 

1  "  Anciens  Fourches  Patibulaires,"  p.  38. 

2  "Le  suicide  est  une  mort  furtive  et  hon- 
teuse,  c'est  un  vol  fait  au  genre  humain." — J.  J. 
Rousseau, 


40  HANGING  IN  CHAINS. 

August  24,  1572,  was  hung  up  by  the 
heels  at  the  gibbet  of  Montfaucon. 
L'Etoile  reports  that  Catherine  de 
Medecis — "pour  repaitre  ses  yeux" — 
went  to  view  him  one  evening. 

It  was  the  custom  in  France  to  try, 
condemn,  and  hang  on  the  gibbet,  in 
human  clothing,  certain  animals  under 
special  circumstances.  So  a  sow,  who 
had  killed  a  child,  was  hung  up  at 
Montigny.  A  bull  was  similarly  tried 
and  condemned  for  killing  a  man,  but 
whether  the  beast  was  gibbeted  is  not 
recorded.  It  may  be  that  the  diffi- 
culty and  inconvenience  of  carrying 
the  matter  out,  or  perhaps  the  trouble 
to  obtain  garments  large  enough, 
caused  our  fantastic  neighbours  to 
draw  the  line  at  the  bull.  But  we 
may  fairly  admire  the  principle  of 
mediaeval  times,  which  seems  to  have 
been  that  justice  should  be  meted  out 
equally  both  to  man  and  beast.      It  is 


HANGING  IN  CHAINS.  41 

pleasant  to  know  that  in  many  Eng- 
lish towns  at  the  present  day  societies 
are  active  in  seeing  that  not  only 
simple  justice,  but,  what  is  much 
better  for  them,  mercy  also,  is  dealt 
out  to  the  poor  dog,  the  poor  horse, 
the  necessary  or  unnecessary  cat, 
and  other  harmless,  helpless  creatures. 


Cfmpter  iv. 


N  Spain  the  body  remained 
usually  upon  the  gallows 
after  execution,  the  gal- 
lows thus  becoming  the 
gibbet.  The  following  story  is  an 
exemplification  of  this  practice  : — 

"  It  was  my  fortune  at  St.  Domingo 
to  enter  the  Town-Church  :  accom- 
panied with  two  French  Puppies, 
mindful  to  shew  me  a  miraculous 
matter. 

"  Where,  when  come,  I  espied  over 
my  head,  opposite  to  the  great  Altar, 
two  milk-white  Hens  enravelled  in  an 


HANGING  IN  CHAINS.  43 

Iron  Cage,  on  the  inner-side  of  the 
Porches  Promontore.  And  demand- 
ing why  they  were  kept  ?  or  what 
they  signified  ?  Certain  Spaniards 
replyed  come  along  with  us,  and  you 
shall  see  the  Story  ;  and  being 
brought  to  the  {Chord)  it  was  drawn 
thereon  as  followeth.  The  Father 
and  the  Son,  two  Bourboneons  of 
France,  going  in  Pilgrimage  to  St. 
James,  it  was  their  lot  to  Lodg  here 
in  an  Inn :  Where  supper  ended,  and 
reckoning  paid,  the  Host  perceiving 
their  denariate  Charge,  he  entered 
their  Chamber,  when  they  were 
asleep,  and  in  Bed,  conveying  his 
own  Purse  in  the  young  man's 
Budget. 

"  To-morrow  early  ;  the  two  inno- 
cent Pilgrims,  footing  the  hard 
bruising  way,  were  quickly  over-hied 
by  the  Justice  ;  where  the  Host 
making  search  for  his  Purse,  found  it 


44  HANGING  IN  CHAINS. 

in  the  Sons  bagg.  Whereupon  in- 
stantly, and  in  the  same  place  he  was 
hanged,  and  left  hanging  there,  seizing 
on  their  money  by  a  Sentential 
forfeiture. 

"  The  sorrowful  Father  (notwith- 
standing) continued  his  Pilgrimage  to 
Compostella.  Where,  when  come,  and 
Devotion  made,  our  Lord  of  Mount 
Serata  appeared  to  him  saying  :  Thy 
prayers  are  heard,  and  thy  Groans 
have  pierced  my  heart,  arise,  and 
return  to  Saint  Domingo,  for  thy  Son 
liveth.  And  he  accordingly  returned, 
found  it  so,  and  the  Son-hanged 
Monster,  after  thirty  days  absence, 
spoke  thus  from  the  Gallows,  Father 
go  to  our  Host,  and  shew  him  I  live, 
then  speedily  return.  By  which  direc- 
tion the  old  man  entered  the  Town, 
and  finding  the  Host  at  Table,  in 
breaking  up  of  two  roasted  Pullets, 
told   him,   and    said  :   My  son   liveth, 


HANGING  IN  CHAINS.  45 

come  and  see.  To  which  the  smiling 
Host  replyd,  he  is  as  surely  alive  on 
the  Gallows,  as  these  two  Pullets  be 
alive  in  the  Dish.  At  which  Protes- 
tation, the  two  fire-scorched  Fowls 
leapt  out  suddenly  alive,  with  Heads, 
Wings,  Feathers,  and  Feet,  and  kek- 
ling  took  flight  thrice  about  the  Table. 
The  which  amazing  sight,  made  the 
astonished  Host  to  confess  his  guilti- 
ness, and  the  other  relieved  from  the 
Rope,  he  was  hung  up  in  his  place, 
allotting  his  house  for  a  Hospitality  to 
Pilgrims  for  ever."  1 

Having  an  opportunity  we  made 
inquiries  in  Holland.  In  that  country 
the  procedure  seems  to  have  been 
much  the  same  as  in  F ranee.  Our 
very  obliging  correspondent  informs 
us  : — 

"  I    am    convinced    that    criminals 

1  Lithgow's  "  Nineteen  Years'  Travels,"  Lon- 
don, 1683. 


46  HANGING  IN  CHAINS. 

remained  for  a  long  time  fastened  to 
the   gallows   after   the   execution.     I 
have  in  my  possession  a  copy  of  an 
old  judgment,  dating  1595,  which,  in 
my   opinion,    gives    full    evidence   of 
what  I  advance,  as  this  criminal  also 
remained    there   a   long    time   after- 
wards.     It  is  written  in  old   Dutch, 
but  let  me  try  to  translate  it,  perhaps 
it  may  interest   you  : — '  The  Sheriffs 
of  the  city  of  Leyden, — Whereas  the 
demand    and    conclusion     done    and 
taken  by  Lot.  E.  Huygengael,  Mayor 
of  this  city,  against  and  on  account  of 
the  dog  of  Jan  Janz  van  den    Poel, 
named  "  Troeveetie,"  or  by  any  other 
name  that  it  might  be  called,  whether 
by  name  or  surname,  at  present  being 
in  prison.     Whereas  the    information 
given  by  M.  Eyssler  for  this  purpose, 
as  well  as  the  prisoner's  own  confes- 
sion, given    without    torture  or  rack. 
Giving  sentence  and  justice  we  have 


HANGING  IN  CHAINS.  47 

of  high  authority  and  on  behalf  of  the 
county  of   Holland   and    West-Fries- 
land,    condemned    it    (the    dog),    by 
these  presents,  to  be  brought  into  the 
yard  of  Graefstyn,  in  this  city,  where 
criminals   are   usually   punished,   and 
that    it    may   there,    by   the    execu 
tioner,  be  hung  by  means  of  a  string 
on  the  gallows,  between  heaven  and 
earth,    so    that    death    may    ensue  ; 
further,  that  its  dead  body  be  dragged 
on  a  stretcher  into  the  gallows-field, 
and  that  there  it  be  suspended  to  the 
gallows  in  horrification   for  all  other 
dogs,  and   as   an    example  to  every- 
body.     We   further   declare    all   his 
assets,  if  it  owns  any,  to  be  forfeited 
and     confiscated    in    favour    of    the 
county  of  Holland  and   West-Fries- 
land.      Actum  in  the  public  court  of 
Justice  —  the   "  Doomstool  "  —  in  the 
presence  of  all  the  Aldermen,  May  25, 

1595.' 


48  HANGING  IN  CHAINS. 

"  This  dog  had  bitten  J.  J.  van  den 
Poel's  baby,  when  playing  at  his 
uncle's  house,  where  the  child  was 
holding  in  his  hand  a  piece  of  meat, 
which  the  dog  had  seized,  and  so 
bitten  the  child,  and  thus  inflicted  a 
wound  on  the  two  fingers  of  the  right 
hand,  through  the  skin  to  the  flesh, 
making  the  blood  pour  out  of  the 
wound,  and  causing  the  child  to  die 
from  this  world  by  the  terror  thus  pro- 
duced within  a  few  days  afterwards."  l 


1   Communicated    by   Mr.   F.   H.    M.   Van 
Lilaar. 


Cbapter  v. 


^: 


ROM  the  stony  horrors 
of  Paris,  and  the  serio- 
grotesque  doings  of  the 
Batavians,  it  will  be  a 
relief  to  turn  to  the  imagery  of  the 
"  Inspired  Dreamer"  : — 

"  Now  I  saw  in  my  dream,  that 
they  went  on  until  they  were  come  to 
the  place  that  Simple,  and  Sloth,  and 
Presumption,  lay  and  slept  in,  when 
Christian  went  by  on  pilgrimage  :  and 
behold  they  were  hanged  up  in  irons, 
a  little  way  off  on  the  other  side." 
This  was  written  between  1660  and 
4 


5o  HANGING  IN  CHAINS. 

1670.  It  is  to  be  observed  that  the 
expression  is  "  irons,"  and  not  chains, 
and  that  the  fact  is  mentioned  in  a 
simple,  natural  way,  as  if  the  mode  of 
punishment  was  quite  usual  for  grave 
offences.  Christiana  says — "  They 
should  never  be  bewailed  by  me ; 
they  have  but  what  they  deserve : 
and  I  think  it  well  that  they  stand  so 
near  the  highway,  that  others  may 
see  and  take  warning."  And  she 
suggests  that  their  crimes  should  be 
engraved  on  an  iron  or  brass  plate, 
and  left  "for  a  caution  to  other  bad 
men/'  which  Greatheart  told  her  had 
already  been  done.  But  Mercy,  with 
a  lack  of  tenderness  which  her  name 
and  fine  earnest  character  do  not 
bespeak,  cries  out,  V  No,  no,  let  them 
hang,  and  their  names  rot,  and  their 
crimes  live  for  ever  against  them ! " 

The     crimes     in     question     were 
combination    against    the    truth,    and 


HANGING  IN  CHAINS.  51 

opposition  unto  holiness,  figuratively 
deserving  the  highest  punishment 
that  could  be  awarded. 

In  that  strange,  shameful,  and 
scarce  book,  "  Le  Moyen  de  Par- 
venir,"  by  Beroalde  de  Verville,  it  is 
recorded  that  when  Charles  V.  made 
his  entry  into  Douai,  the  inhabitants 
set  up  triumphal  arches  and  like 
embellishments.  At  the  last  moment 
they  bethought  themselves  of  a 
wretch  who  was  gibbeted  hard  by 
the  gate  of  the  principal  entrance. 
Him  they  therefore  dressed  in  a  clean 
white  shirt,  to  do  honour  to  the 
emperor.1      It  will   be   noticed    that 

1  "Quand  l'Empereur  Charles  y  fit  son 
entree ;  les  gens  de  cette  ville-la  lui  voulurent 
faire  tout  l'honneur  qu'ils  purent.  Et  faisant 
de  belle  facons  d'arcades,  chapeaux  de  triom- 
phes,  poiteaux  et  telles  magnificences,  ils 
s'aviserent  d'un  pendu  qui  etait  a  la  porte  de 
la  ville  et  principale  entree.  Ils  oterent  a  ce 
pendu  sa  chemise  sale,  et  lui  en  mirent  une 


52  HANGING  IN  CHAINS. 

they  did  not  take  the  body  away, 
which  would  have  been  easier ;  that 
would  have  been  illegal. 

Before  proceeding  further  it  must 
be  stated,  as  it  were  to  clear  the 
ground,  that  there  were  certain 
treasonable  offences  for  which  women 
might  be  convicted,  and  it  is  to  the 
credit  of  the  English  law  that  the 
solemn  and  terrible  sentence  was  not 
carried  out  upon  them  in  its  fulness, 
so  that,  both  for  high  treason  and 
petit  treason,  the  sentence  ordered 
merely  drawing  to  the  gallows  and 
burning  alive.  This  sentence  was 
modified  in  30  George  III.  (1 791) 
to  drawing,  hanging,  and  dissecting. 
It     is     similarly    to     the     credit     of 

blanche  pour  faire  honneur  a  Monsieur 
l'Empereur "  (Le  Moyen  de  Parvenir :  con- 
tenant  la  raison  de  tout  ce  qui  a  et£,  est  et 
sera.  Nulle  Part.,  1000700504,  vol.  ii. 
p.  249). 


HANGING  IN  CHAINS.  53 

humanity  that  the  bodies  of  women 
were  not  publicly  exposed  on  gibbets 
in  irons  and  chains. 

In  France  the  same  feelings  of 
respect  and  propriety  prevented  the 
hanging  of  women  at  the  "  fourches 
patibulaires."  The  sentence  for 
grave  offences  was  that  of  "la 
fosse,"  or  burying  alive,  usually  in 
front  of   the  gibbet. 

It  will  be  convenient  now  to  give  a 
variety  of  examples  further  illustrating 
the  subject  specially  under  our  notice. 

We  learn  from  the  parish  registers 
of  Bourne,  in  Cambridgeshire,  that 
Richard  Foster,  his  wife,  and  his  child, 
were  buried  on  Shrove  Wednesday, 
1 67 1.  All  three  were  murdered  on 
the  preceding  Sunday  by  a  miscreant 
named  George  Atkins.  He  evaded 
the  law  for  seven  years,  but  was 
finally  captured,  hung,  and  gibbeted  on 
Caxton  Common,  adjoining  Bourne. 


54  HANGING  IN  CHAINS. 

In  1674  Thomas  Jackson,  a  noto- 
rious highwayman,  was  executed  for 
the  murder  of  Henry  Miller.  He 
was  hung  in  chains  on  a  gibbet  set 
up  between  two  elm  trees  on 
Hampstead  Heath,  one  of  which 
still  remains,  known  as  "  Gallows 
Tree."  Jackson  left  a  "  Recantation," 
which  was  printed  in  quarto  form 
immediately  after  his  death.  In  this 
rare  tract  "is  truly  discovered  the 
whole  mystery  of  that  Wicked  and 
Fatal  Profession  of  Padding  in  the 
Road." 

In  1687  a  person  named  Bunbury 
was  barbarously  murdered  by  one 
Loseby,  who  was  caught  almost  red- 
handed,  executed,  and  hung  in  chains 
on  the  top  of  a  tumulus  on  the 
Watling  Street  Road,  about  four 
miles  from  Rugby.  The  spot  is 
marked  in  Beighton's  map  of  War- 
wickshire, from  a  survey  made  in  1725, 


HANGING  IN  CHAINS.  55 

as  "  Loseby's  Gibbet."  The  tumulus 
was  demolished — as  so  many  others 
unfortunately  have  been — in  the 
latter  part  of  the  last  century,  on 
the  making  of  a  turnpike  road 
between  Daintry  and  Lutterworth.1 
In  modern  maps  the  site  of  the 
tumulus  is  forgotten,  and  the  spot 
being  now  known  as  "  Gibbet  Hill," 
the  ancient  history  is  wiped  out,  or, 
perhaps,  to  put  it  more  justly,  one 
kind  of  history  replaces  another,  as 
it  ever  has  done,  in  the  revolutions 
of  time,  and  an  entirely  new  train 
of  thoughts  is  called  up. 

In  1690  one  William  Barwick, 
while  out  walking  with  his  wife  at 
Cawood,  a  few  miles  south  of  York, 
threw  her  into  a  pond,  drowned  her, 
drew  her  out,  and  buried  her 
then     and     there,     in     her     clothes. 

1  Information  from  the  late  Mr.  M.  H.  Bloxam. 


56  HANGING  IN  CHAINS. 

Barwick's  brother-in-law's  suspicions 
arose,  and  inquiries  were  set  about ; 
the  man  confessed,  and  was  duly 
tried,  condemned,  and  executed  at 
York,  and  hung  in  chains  by  the  side 
of  the  fatal  pond.  The  curious  part 
of  this  case  was  that  Barwick's 
brother-in-law  was  urged  to  move 
in  the  matter  in  consequence  of  his 
having  seen,  or  fancied  he  saw — it 
was  all  the  same  in,  and  long  after, 
the  time  of  Matthew  Hopkins1 — 
a  few  days  after  the  murder,  the 
ghost  of  his  sister,  by  the  side  of 
the  water,  at  twelve  o'clock  in  the 
daytime!  And  his  deposition  to 
that  effect  was  taken  before  the  Lord 


1  Witch-Finder  General,  under  a  commission 
from  Parliament  in  the  reign  of  Charles  I. 
He  hung  threescore  suspected  witches  in  one 
year  in  Suffolk  under  most  wicked  and 
degrading  circumstances. 


HANGING  IN  CHAINS.  57 

Mayor  on  the  day  preceding  the 
trial.1 

Probably  if  Barwick  had  not  con- 
fessed, his  case,  in  those  times, 
against  such  evidence  as  this,  would 
have  been  quite  hopeless. 

When  the  convicted  man  mounted 
the  gallows  he  naively  told  the  hang- 
man that  he  hoped  the  rope  was 
strong  enough,  because,  he  said,  if 
it  broke  with  his  weight,  he  would 
fall  to  the  ground,  and  become  a 
cripple  for  life.  His  apprehensions 
were  quieted  by  the  hangman's  assur- 
ance that  he  might  venture  upon  the 
rope  with  perfect  confidence.  And 
so  it  turned  out,  for  it  was,  as 
American  speculators  would  say,  a 
"  spot "  transaction. 

For  examples  in  the  early  years  of 


1  Rev.  S.  Baring-Gould,  "  Yorkshire  Oddities," 
vol.  i.  p.  56. 


58  HANGING  IN  CHAINS. 

the  eighteenth  century,  the  following 
will  suffice ;  they  show  how  thick 
the  gibbets  were  near  London. 

Edward  Tooll,  executed  on  Finch- 
ley  Common,  Feb.,  1700,  and  after- 
wards hung  in  chains. — Michael  Von 
Berghem,  and  another,  executed  at 
the  Hartshorne  Brewery,  June,  1700, 
and  hung  in  chains,  between  Mile 
End  and  Bow. — William  Elby,  ex- 
ecuted at  Fulham,  in  the  town, 
Aug.,  1707,  and  hung  in  chains  there. 
—Hermann  Brian,  executed  in  St. 
James's  Street,  near  St.  James's 
House,  Oct.,  1707,  and  hung  in  chains 
at  Acton  Gravel  Pits. — Richard  Keele, 
and  William  Lowther,  executed  on 
Clerkenwell  Green,  1 713,  conveyed 
to  Holloway,  and  there  hung  in 
chains. — John  Tomkins,  executed  at 
Tyburn,  Feb.,  171 7,  with  fourteen 
other  malefactors,  and  hung  in  chains. 
— Joseph  Still,  executed  on  Stamford 


HANGING  IN  CHAINS.  59 

Hill  Road,  and  hung  in  chains  in 
the  Kingsland  Road. — John  Price, 
executed  in  Bunhill  Fields,  and  hung 
in  chains  near  Hollo  way,   171 7.1 

1  "Notes  and  Queries,"  1874,  vol.  i.  p.  35. 
Fifth  Series. 


Chapter  vi. 

T  will  be  recollected  that 
one  of  the  most  interest- 
ing of  Sir  Walter  Scott's 
novels,  "  The  Pirate,"  is 
founded  upon  a  case  of  piracy  in  the 
Orkneys,  in  1725.1  The  captain,  John 
Gow,  and  his  crew,  were  secured,  with 
much  courage  and  address,  by  a  pa- 
triotic inhabitant,  James  Fea,  and  the 


1  It  may  be  recalled  that  Defoe  published, 
anonymously,  in  1725,  a  most  interesting  and 
vivid  account  of  the  conduct,  proceedings,  and 
capture  of  the  pirate  Gow  and  his  buccaneer 
crew. 


HANGING  IN  CHAINS.  61 

prisoners  were  prosecuted  by  the  High 
Court  of  Admiralty.  The  remarkable 
part  of  this  affair  was  that,  on  Gow 
"  standing  mute,"  that  is,  refusing  to 
plead,  the  judge  ordered  that  he  should 
be  brought  to  the  bar  and  his  thumbs 
squeezed  by  two  men  with  a  whipcord 
until  it  broke ;  that  it  should  be 
doubled,  and  then  trebled,  and  that  the 
operators  should  pull  with  their  whole 
strength.  This  discipline  Gow  endured 
with  much  fortitude,  but  when  he  had 
seen  the  preparations  for  pressing 
him  to  death — the  peine  forte  et  dure, 
— until  he  died,  or  pleaded,  his  cour- 
age gave  way, — few  men,  especially 
bad  ones,  can  look  unflinchingly  into 
the  dark  valley, — and  he  said  he  would 
not  have  given  so  much  trouble  if  he 
could  have  been  assured  of  not  being 
hung  in  chains.  He  was  convicted, 
hung,  and  gibbeted  in  the  chains  he  so 
much  dreaded. 


62  HANGING  IN  CHAINS. 

Apropos  of  the  peine  forte  et  dure, 
in  March,  1674,  a  man  living  at  Can- 
nock was  arraigned  at  the  Stafford 
Assizes  for  the  murder  of  his  father, 
mother,  and  wife.  He  refused  to  plead, 
but  was  adjudged  guilty.  For  his  con- 
tumacy he  was  sentenced  to  undergo 
the  peine forte  et  dure,  or ■,  in  other  words 
to  be  pressed  to  death.  This  was 
carried  out,  as  appears  from  a  picture 
in  the  Salt  Library  at  Stafford,  show- 
ing the  unhappy  wretch  lying  on  the 
floor,  with  a  board  on  his  chest  covered 
with  a  number  of  heavy  weights.1 

This  must  have  been  a  more  dread- 
ful agony,  while  it  lasted,  than  the 
"little  ease"  or  the  "rack."  The 
severity  of  the  latter  engine  is  suffi- 
ciently attested  by  the  signatures  of 


1  J.  L.  Cherry,  "  Stafford  "  in  Olden  Times, 
p.  80. 


HANGING  IN  CHAINS.  63 

Guy    Fawkes  before    and   after    that 
ordeal.1 

In  1726  Mrs.  Catherine  Hayes  was 
burnt  alive,  doubtless  for  high  or  petit 
treason.2 


1  "Mute 
The  camel  labours  with  the  heaviest  load, 
And  the  wolf  dies  in  silence.     Not  bestowed 
In  vain  should  such  examples  be  :  if  they, 
Things  of  ignoble  or  of  savage  mood, 
Endure  and  shrink  not,  we,  of  nobler  clay, 
May  temper  it  to  bear." 

"  Childe  Harold,"  iv.  21. 
2  High  Treason,  as  denned  by  the  Statute  of 
25  Edward  III.  (1351),  is  divided  by  Blackstone 
into  seven  distinct  branches.  The  first  is  "  com- 
passing or  imagining  the  death  of  the  King,  the 
Queen,  or  their  eldest  son  and  heir."  2.  "  Vio- 
lating the  King's  companion,  or  the  King's 
eldest  daughter  unmarried,  or  the  wife  of  the 
King's  eldest  son  and  heir."  3.  "  Levying  war 
against  the  King  in  his  realm."  4.  "Adhering 
to  the  King's  enemies  in  his  realm,  or  elsewhere." 
5.  "Counterfeiting  the  King's  great  or  privy 
seal."  6.  "Counterfeiting  the  King's  money." 
7.  "  Slaying  the  chancellor,  treasurer,  or  any  of 
the  King's  justices,  being  in  their  places,  doing 


64  HANGING  IN  CHAINS. 

We  gather  from  Howell's  State 
Trials  that  when  the  English  Regency- 
made  an  order,  in  1742,  to  hang  the 
body  of  the  murderer  of  Mr.  Penny 
in  chains,  they  inserted  therein  that 
it  was  on  the  petition  of  the  relatives 
of  the  deceased.1 

In  1742  John  Breeds  a  butcher  of 
Rye,  conceived  a  violent  animosity 
against  Mr.  Thomas  Lamb  of  the 
same  place,  and,  as  the  old  Statute  of 
High  Treason  would  put  it,  "  com- 
passed and  imagined  "  his  death.    The 


their  offices."     (Blackstone's,  Comm.  vol.  iv.  p. 

76). 

Petit  Treason  is  aggravated  murder,  according 
to  the  same  Statute  ;  and  may  happen  in  three 
ways  :  1.  "  By  a  servant  killing  his  master."  2. 
"By  a  wife  killing  her  husband."  3.  "By  an 
ecclesiastic  killing  his  superior."  (Blackstone,  ib, 
p.  202). 

1  A  Regency  of  Lords  Justices  administered 
the  government  during  the  numerous  absences 
of  the  King  in  Hanover, 


HANGING  IN  CHAINS.  65 

opportunity  seemed  to  present  itself 
on  the  night  of  March  17th,  on  the 
occasion  of  Mr.  Lamb  being  about  to 
see  a  friend  off  by  ship  to  France. 
But,  changing  his  mind  at  the  last 
moment,  he  requested  his  neighbour, 
Mr.  Grebble,  to  take  his  place,  which 
he  did.  Breeds,  or,  as  he  is  called  on 
Mr.  Grebble' s  tombstone,  the  "  san- 
guinary butcher,"  sharpened  his  knife 
and  took  his  station  in  the  shadowy 
churchyard,  and  soon  rushed  on  the 
unsuspecting  Mr.  Grebble,  and  mor- 
tally stabbed  him.  The  unfortunate 
victim  had  strength  enough  to  reach 
his  house,  and  sit  himself  in  a  chair, 
out  of  which  he  very  soon  fell,  and  died, 
to  the  great  consternation  of  his  ser- 
vant, who  was  at  once  suspected  of 
being  the  murderer.  The  conduct  of 
Breeds,  however,  soon  cleared  up  all 
doubts  upon  this  point.  He  was  tried, 
and  found  guilty,  and  condemned  to 


66  HANGING  IN  CHAINS. 

death,  and  to  be  hung  in  chains.  For 
this  purpose  a  gibbet  was  set  up  in  a 
marsh  at  the  west  end  of  the  town 
now  called  "  Gibbet  Marsh."  The 
carcass  of  Breeds  swung  for  many- 
years  on  the  morass,  and  when  all 
but  the  upper  part  of  the  skull  had 
dropped  away,  the  chains  and  frame 
were  rescued  by  the  Corporation  of 
Rye,  and  have,  by  lapse  of  time, 
acquired  a  kind  of  grim  interest,  if  not 
exactly  to  "  adorn  a  tale,"  at  least 
"to  point  a  moral." 

In  1747  Christopher  Holliday  was 
beaten  to  death  with  his  own  staff  by 
a  cold-blooded  savage,  Adam  Graham, 
on  Beck  Moor,  near  Balenbush,  on 
the  English  side  of  the  Border.  Gra- 
ham was  executed  at  Carlisle,  and  his 
body  hung  in  chains  upon  a  gibbet 
twelve  yards  high,  on  Kingmoor,  with 
twelve  thousand  nails  driven  into  it 
to  prevent  it  being  swarmed,  or  cut 


BREEDS'S     IRONS,      1742. 

{From  a  photograph. ) 


HANGING  IN  CHAINS.  67 

down,  and  the  body  carried  off.  The 
murderer  left  a  confession  of  several 
other  crimes,  which  was  published  at 
the  time  in  pamphlet  form,  and  had  a 
large  sale. 

The  smugglers  also  fell  into  the 
dire  clutches  of  the  law  for  the  good 
reason  that  their  vulgar  atrocities  de- 
served the  highest  punishment.  They 
were  not  graceful  villains  like  Claud 
Duval,  that  hero  of  the  mob,  who  is 
said — but  by  disinterested  witnesses— 
to  have  quite  charmed  the  victims 
while  he  broke  two  of  the  command- 
ments. Thus  William  Carter,  smug- 
gler and  murderer,  was  executed  and 
hung  up  in  chains  near  Rake,  on  the 
Portsmouth  road,  in  1749.1  Four 
others,  concerned  in  the  same  crime, 
were  similarly  gibbeted.     One  of  the 

1  "Sussex  Archaeological    Collections,"   vol. 
xxiii.  p.  215. 


68  HANGING  IN  CHAINS. 

leg  pieces  of  Carter's  irons  is  in  the 
collection  of  Lady  Dorothy  Nevill. 
Implicated  in  this  affair  —  namely, 
the  robbery  of  the  Custom  House  at 
Poole,  and  the  murder  of  Mr.  Galley 
and  Mr.  Chater — was  William  Jack- 
son. He,  also,  was  condemned  to  be 
hung,  and  gibbeted  in  chains  ;  but  the 
poor  wretch  was  so  ill,  and  horror- 
struck  when  they  measured  him  for 
his  irons,  that  he  died  of  fright.  His 
body  was  thrown  into  a  hole  near 
Carter's  gibbet.  A  memorial  stone, 
with  a  long  inscription  recording  the 
crime  in  which  so  many  suffered,  was 
set  up  on  the  spot  in  1749,  and  still 
remains. 

Under  the  pressure  of  a  belief  in 
the  extraordinary  delusion  of  witch- 
craft, a  harmless  and  aged  couple  at 
Tring, — who  had  been  removed  from 
the  workhouse  to  the  church  for  safety, 
— were    seized    and     so     shockingly 


HANGING  IN  CHAINS.  69 

handled  and  ducked  by  a  mob  at  Long 
Marston,  near  Tring,  in  1751,  that  the 
woman,  Ruth  Osborne,  died  on  the 
spot.  The  ringleader,  Thomas  Colley, 
was  tried  at  Hertford,  when  the  re- 
volting particulars  of  the  barbarities 
were  proved.  He  was  taken  for 
execution  to  Gubblecote  Cross,  in 
Long  Marston  parish,  thirty  miles  from 
Hertford,  and  so  great  was  the  in- 
fatuation, and  sympathy  for  the  man 
who  had  "destroyed  an  old  wicked 
woman  that  had  done  so  much  mis- 
chief by  her  witchcraft,"  that  a  strong 
escort  of  horse  was  necessary.  The 
body  of  Colley  was  afterwards  hung 
in  chains  on  the  same  gallows,  the 
people  of  Long  Marston,  many  of 
whom  were  present  at  the  murder, 
having  petitioned  against  the  gibbet- 
ing near  their  houses.1 

*  "Gentleman's  Magazine,"  1751,  p.  186. 


Chapter  vn. 


Y  this  time,  as  we  have 
seen,  it  had  gradually  be- 
come usual  for  the  court, 
in  atrocious  cases,  to  direct 
that  the  murderer's  body  should  be 
hung  upon  a  gibbet  in  chains,  near 
the  place  where  the  fact  was  com- 
mitted ;  but  this  was  no  part  of  the 
legal  judgment.1  By  an  Act  of  25 
George  IL  (1752)  gibbeting  in  chains 
was  first  legally  recognized.  By  this 
statute  it  was  enacted  that  the  body 


1  Blackstone,  "  Comra."  vol.  iv.  p.  202, 


HANGING  IN  CHAINS.  71 

should,  after  sentence  delivered  and 
execution  done,  be  given  to  the  sur- 
geons to  be  dissected  and  anatomized, 
and  that  the  judge  may  direct  the 
body  to  be  afterwards  hung  in  chains, 
but  in  no  wise  to  be  buried  without 
dissection.1 

But  still  the  gibbeting  did  not 
form,  as  it  never  has  formed,  part 
of  the  legal  sentence.2  The  judge 
could  direct  it  to  be  carried  out  by  a 
special  order  to  the  sheriff^  and  this 
was  sometimes  done  —  as  we  have 
seen  in  the  case  of  Mr.  Penny's 
murder  in  1741 — on  the  petition  of 
the  relatives  of  the  deceased.  The 
theory  was  that  the  body  was  at  the 
disposal  of  the  Crown,  and  that  an 
order  to  hang  in  chains  would  be 
granted  on  application  to  the  proper 

1  Blackstone,  "  Comm."  vol.  iv.  p.  202. 

2  Do.  do.  ib. 

3  Do.  do.  ib. 


72  HANGING  IN  CHAINS. 

authorities.  This  post-mortem  revenge- 
ment  was  thought  to  be  a  singular 
great  comfort  to  the  relatives  of  the 
murdered  man.  The  Roman  law  also 
permitted  the  murderer's  body  to  re- 
main on  the  gibbet  after  execution, 
as  a  comfortable  sight  to  the  relatives 
of  the  deceased  : — "Famosos  latrones, 
in  his  locis,  ubi  graffati  sunt,  furca 
figendos  placuit :  ut  et  conspictu  de- 
terreantur  alii,  et  solatio  sit  cognatis 
interemptorum."  l 

The  Act  of  1752  seems  to  have 
cleared  the  way  considerably,  and 
from  this  date  gibbetings  rapidly  in- 
creased. It  may  here  be  recalled 
that  the  idea  of  being  gibbeted  was 
ever  a  very  terrifying  one  to  the 
sufferer,  and  many  a  strong  man  who 
had  stood  fearless  under  the  dread 
sentence  broke   down  when    he   was 

»  Ff.  48,  19,  28,  §  15. 


HANGING  IN  CHAINS.  73 

measured  .for  his  irons.  We  may 
inquire  a  little  what  was  in  prospect 
for  the  caitiff  that  made  the  iron  so 
to  enter  into  his  soul. 

At  Newgate,  which  no  doubt  gave 
the  example  to  other  prisons,  it  was 
the  custom,  after  execution,  to  con- 
vey the  body  into  a  place  grimly 
called  "  the  Kitchen."  Here  stood 
a  caldron  of  boiling  pitch,  and  into 
this  the  carcass  was  thrown.  It  was 
shortly  after  withdrawn,  placed  in  the 
chains,  and  these  cold-rivetted — truly 
enough  "  fast  bound  in  misery  and 
iron."  We  can  picture  the  brutal 
work,  with,  no  doubt,  the  coarse  jest- 
ing, when  the  dead  malefactor  was 
finally  rivetted  up  in  what  was  called 
"his  last  suit." 

"  'Twas  strange,  'twas  passing  strange ; 
'Twas  pitiful,  'twas  wondrous  pitiful."  I 

1  Othello ',  Act  i.  sc.  3. 
5 


74  HANGING  IN  CHAINS. 

Occasionally  the  bodies  were  put  into 
sacks,  and  so  hung  up.  In  France 
also,  men  in  the  fifteenth  century 
were  drowned  in  sacks  of  leather ; 
hence  the  term  "  gens  de  sac  et  de 
corde  "  for  evilly-disposed  persons  at 
the  present  day. 

It  is  well  known — for  there  is  fre- 
quent allusion  to  it  in  the  literature 
of  the  time — that  travellers  approach- 
ing London  and  other  large  cities,  in 
the  last  century,  were  offended,  both 
in  sight  and  in  other  ways,  by  the 
number  of  dingy,  dead,  iron-bound 
bodies  that  welcomed  them.  In  re- 
mote parts  a  gibbet  had  the  effect 
of  diverting  the  slender  traffic — at 
least  when  night  set  in.  Belated 
wayfarers  were  grieved  by  the  horrid 
grating  sound  as  the  body  in  the  iron 
frame  swung  creaking  to  and  fro. 
Thus  Shakespeare  :— 


HANGING  IN  CHAINS.  75 

"  Against  the  senseless  winds  shall  grin  in  vain, 
Who  in  contempt  shall  hiss  at  thee  again."  l 

And  in  the  daytime  these  odd  features 
in  an  English  landscape  often  proved 
an  attraction  to  flippant  sporting  men. 
On  the  banks  of  the  Thames,  op- 
posite Blackwall,  hung  the  bodies  of 
numerous  pirates.  The  Rev.  T. 
Mozeley,  in  his  "  Reminiscences," 
tells  us  that  "  the  only  inhabitants 
of  the  Isle  of  Dogs  that  I  ever  saw 
were  three  murderers  hanging  from 
a  gibbet."  A  correspondent  tells  us 
"  they  looked  like  scarecrows."  One 
of  Hogarth's  pictures  of  "  The  Idle 
Apprentice"  series  shows  the  pirates 
hanging  in  the  distance.2  In  later 
times,  in  the  windows  of  the  water- 
side    taverns     at     Blackwall,     "  spy- 

1  King  Henry  VI,  Part  ii.  Act  iv.  sc.  1. 

2  Two  sets  of  pirates'  chains  from  the  Thames 
are  in  the  collection  of  the  Rev.  J.  W.  Totten- 
ham. 


76  HANGING  IN  CHAINS. 

glasses,"  or  what  Robinson  Crusoe 
called  "  perspective  glasses/'  were 
fixed  for  people  to  enjoy  the  spec- 
tacle ;  similarly  the  Greenwich  pen- 
sioners on  the  Hill  used  to  exhibit 
the  gibbeted  pirates  on  the  opposite 
side  of  the  river,  in  the  Isle  of  Dogs, 
through  telescopes  ;  and  when  the 
bodies  were  removed  by  legislative 
enactment,  some  of  the  forward  news- 
papers of  the  day  made  an  outcry 
that  the  holiday-makers  were  deprived 
of  their  amusements.1 

In  the  same  manner,  at  Northamp- 
ton, on  the  occasion  of  the  last  public 
execution  there,  in  1852,  thousands  of 
people  gathered  together,  and  were 
painfully  disappointed  and  turbulent 
when  they  found  the  day  had  been 
changed.       Some    of    these   worthies 


1  "Notes  and  Queries,"  1874,  vol.  i.  p.  35. 
Fifth  Series. 


A   THAMES    PIRATE 


HANGING  IN  CHAINS.  77 

said  if  they  could  only  get  at  the 
under-sheriff  "  they  would  let  him 
know  what  it  was  to  keep  honest  folk 
in  suspense,"  one  old  woman  loudly 
declaring-  that  she  should  claim  her 
expenses  from  the  authorities.1  The 
New  Drop  set  up  at  the  Northamp- 
ton County  Gaol  in  18 18  was  of  such 
ample  capacity  that  it  was  proudly 
described  by  the  governor  as  efficient 
for  the  hanging  of  twelve  persons 
"  comfortably."  2 

1  C.  A.  Markham,  "  Ancient  Punishments  in 
Northamptonshire,"  p.  16.  2  Ibid. 


V 


CJmptet  viii. 

N  1752  Captain  Lo  wry- 
suffered  at  Execution 
Dock,  and  was  hung  in 
chains  by  the  side  of 
the  Thames,  doubtless  for  piracy  ; 
and  in  the  same  year  John  Swan 
was  executed  at  Chelmsford  and  hung 
in  chains  in  Epping  Forest. 

In  1764  William  Corbett  was  exe- 
cuted on  Kennington  Common.  His 
body  was  ic  fixed  in  irons  " — a  new 
expression — and  hung  upon  Gallery 
Wall,  between  Rotherhithe  and  Dept- 
ford.     Eighteen  years  earlier  the  gal- 


HANGING  IN  CHAINS.  79 

lant  young  rebel,  Jemmy  Dawson, 
had  been  hung,  drawn,  and  quartered 
on  the  same  common  for  "  the  -45." 
A  young  lady — "  dear  Kitty,  peerless 
maid ! " — died  of  a  broken  heart  on 
the  day  of  his  execution. 

"  She  followed  him,  prepared  to  view 
The  terrible  behests  of  law ; 
And  the  last  scene  of  Jemmy's  woes 
With  calm  and  stedfast  eye  she  saw." * 

On  November  16,  1766,  Thomas 
Parker  called  on  his  way  from  Pen- 
rith Market  at  a  small  inn  at  Carlton. 
Being  somewhat  the  worse  for  drink,2 


1  Percy.      "  Reliques    of   Ancient     English 
Poetry,"  vol.  i.  p.  306. 
2  "Ale  makes  many  a  man  reel  over  the  fallows; 

Ale  makes  many  a  man  to  swear  by  God  and 
All-Hallows ; 

Ale  makes  many  a  man  to  hang  upon  the 

gallows — 

With  dole." 

"Songs  and  Carols."     Edited  by  Thomas 

Wright.     Percy  Society,  1847. 


80  HANGING  IN  CHAINS. 

the  landlord  urged  him  to  remain,  but 
the  shaggy  sot  pressed  on  his  way, 
and  was  murdered  the  same  night. 
The  affair  caused  an  extraordinary 
local  interest  among  a  population  who 
had  not  forgotten  the  shocking  inci- 
dents of  the  punishments  for  the 
Rebellion  of  twenty  years  before. 
The  poor  muddled  man  had  been 
beaten  to  death  by  one  Thomas 
Nicholson,  after  a  violent  struggle 
with  the  assassin.  The  murderer, 
upon  strong  circumstantial  evidence, 
was  sentenced  to  be  executed,  and 
his  body  to  be  hung  in  chains  near 
where  the  crime  was  committed.  It 
so  hung  for  many  years,  slowly  drop- 
ping to  pieces,  until  on  one  stormy 
night  the  gibbet  was  blown  down. 
Shortly  after  some  humane  persons 
from  Edenhall  came  and  gathered 
the  desolate  bones  together,  wrapped 
them  in  a  winnowin^-sheet — it  sounds 


HANGING  IN  CHAINS.  81 

like  an  episode  from  the  Apocry- 
pha, like  a  good  deed  of  Tobit — and 
laid  them  in  a  grave.  The  spot  was 
long  after  distinguished  by  the  letters, 
large  and  legible,  deeply  cut  in  the 
turf,  "  T.  P.  M.,"  signifying  "  here 
Thomas  Parker  was  murdered."  l 

The  hanging  in  chains  of  a  man 
named  Corbet,  of  Tring,  who  mur- 
dered Richard  Holt  in  1773,  is  note- 
worthy, as  the  last  instance  of  gibbeting 
in  the  county  of  Buckingham.2 

A  notorious  highwayman,  John 
Whitfield,  was  executed  and  gibbeted 
on  Barrock,  near  Wetheral,  Cumber- 
land, about  the  year  1777.  It  is  said 
that  he  was  gibbeted  alive,  and  that 
the  guard  of  a  passing  mail-coach  put 
him  out  of  his  misery  by  shooting  him. 


1  "  History  of  Penrith,"  ut  sup. 

2  "  Records  of  Buckinghamshire,"  paper  by 
the  Rev.  J.  C.  Wharton,  vol.  ii.  p.  159, 


82  HANGING  IN  CHAINS. 

If  this  were  true  the  guard  was  clearly 
guilty  of  murder.  We  shall  have 
occasion  to  revert  to  this  question. 
Later,  a  sergeant  was  reduced  to  the 
ranks  for  shooting  at  the  dead  body 
in  chains  of  Jerry  Abershaw,  a 
notorious  brigand,  on  Wimbledon 
Common.1 

In  the  year  1785  the  Rev.  Thomas 
Kerrich  made  sketches  of  two  men 
hanging  in  chains  upon  one  gibbet 
on  Brandon  Sands,  Suffolk.  At  the 
present  day  all  other  record  both  of 
the  men  (May  and  Tybald),  their 
crimes,  and  their  punishment,  has,  like 
the  coral  worm  of  the  completed  reef, 
utterly  passed  away;  all  has  succumbed 
to  "  the  tooth  of  time,  and  razure  of 
oblivion."  The  gibbet  post  is  shown 
bound  with  iron  bands  to  prevent 
cutting  down. 

1  "Notes  and  Queries,"  1873,  v°l-  xi-  PP-  83, 
125.     Fourth  Series, 


GIBBET   ON    BRANDON    SANDS,    1785. 

{From  a  sketch  by  the  Rev.  Thomas  Kerrich.) 


HANGING  IN  CHAINS.  83 

About  the  middle  of  the  last  century 
three  men  who  robbed  the  north  mail 
near  the  Chevin,  over  against  Belper, 
were  all  executed  and  hung  in  chains 
on  one  gibbet  on  the  top  of  the  moun- 
tain. "  Now  then,  you  three,  hang 
there,  and  be  a  sign."  I 

It  is  recorded  that  a  friendly  hand 
set  fire  one  night  to  the  gibbet  which, 
with  all   three  bodies  well  saturated 
with  pitch,  was  burnt  to  ashes,  leaving 
only  the  irons  and  chains  remaining.2 
Not  unduly  to  multiply  instances  we 
may  hurry  on  to  1788.     In  this  year 
the  postboy  between  Warrington  and 
Northwich   was   robbed   by   William 
Lewin.       This    was    still    a    capital 
offence,  but  the  culprit  evaded  justice 
for  three  years.     Being  finally  over- 


1  "  The  Pilgrim's  Progress,"  chap,  iv.,  Fate 
of  Simple,  Sloth,  and  Presumption. 

2  "The  Antiquary,"  Nov.,  1890. 


84  HANGING  IN  CHAINS. 

taken  he  was  executed  at  Chester, 
and  his  body  hung  in  chains  on  the 
highest  point  of  Helsby  Tor,  eight 
miles  from  Chester,  and  visible,  as  it 
was  said,  "  with  glasses,"  even  from 
the  Peak  of  Derbyshire.  It  was 
evidently  believed  that  the  whole 
country  round  would  see  and  take 
warning.1 

"...  but  they  kill'd  him,  they 
KilPd  him  for  robbing  the  mail, 
They  hanged  him  in  chains  for  a  show." 2 

There  were  then  three  gibbets  be- 
tween Liverpool  and  Warrington. 

But  the  system,  like  all  violent 
systems,  was  not  deterrent — indeed,  a 
multitude  of  men  hanging  in  chains 
seems  to  affect  the  spectator  rather  as 
a  curious  sight  than  as  the  necessary 
and  proper  consequence  of  transgres- 
sion. 


1  C.  Madeley,  "  Obsolete  Punishments,"  p.  35. 

2  "Rizpah,"  Tennyson. 


MILES  S    IRONS,    1 79 1. 

{From  "  Obsolete  Pii7iiskments"  by  C.  Madeley.) 


HANGING  IN  CHAINS.  85 

Five  months  after  the  death  of  the 
last-mentioned  criminal,  Edward  Miles 
was  executed  and  hung  in  chains,  not 
only  for  robbing  the  mail,  but  for 
murdering  the  postboy  also.  It  was 
a  serious  case,  and  the  man  was  hung, 
and  gibbeted  in  irons  on  the  Man- 
chester road,  near  the  Twystes.  These 
irons,  of  a  very  careful  manufacture, 
were  dug  up  on  the  spot  in  1845,  and 
falling  into  the  hands  of  the  late  Mr. 
Beaumont,  are  now  preserved  in  the 
Warrington  Museum. 

In  1796  James  Price  and  Thomas 
Brown  were  hung  in  chains  on  one 
gibbet  at  Trafford,  between  Chester 
and  Tarporley.  A  print  in  the  ac- 
count of  the  trial  shows  the  carcasses 
in  iron  frames  shaped  to  the  body  like 
the  Warrington  example.1 

To  take  again  a  southern  case.     In 

1  Communicated  by  Mr.  C.  Madeley. 


86  HANGING  IN  CHAINS. 

1799  two  brothers  named  Drewett,  for 
attacking  the  Portsmouth  mail,  in  the 
delightful  district  of  Midhurst,  were 
executed  on  Horsham  Common,  and 
their  bodies  taken  to  the  scene  of  the 
robbery,  and  hung  up  in  irons.  This 
event  still  lingers  in  memory  in  the 
district,  and  the  more  so,  perhaps, 
because  the  younger  of  the  two  con- 
victs is  believed  to  have  had  the 
nobility  to  suffer  for  his  father,  whose 
guilt  he  would  not  disclose.1  The 
"  last  dying  speeches "  of  these  two 
men,  printed  with  uncouth  verbiage, 
and  picturesque  deformity  of  language, 
is  still  occasionally  to  be  met  with. 

1  "  Sussex   Archaeological   Collections,"   vol. 
xxiii.  pp.  214-5. 


Chapter  ix. 


EW  persons  of  taste  have 
failed  to  make  themselves 
acquainted  with  the  works 
of  Bewick,  the  father  of 
English  wood-engraving.  In  them  we 
have  everything  the  most  truthful  and 
poetical.  Wide,  wild  moor,  the  deso- 
lation of  winter,  with  the  solitary- 
worn-out  horse,  forgotten  in  the  snowy 
waste  ;  the  falling  fane,  the  crumbling 
tower  ;  scenes  on  northern  shores, — 
rocks  and  sea-fowl,  wrecks  and  tern- 


88  HANGING  IN  CHAINS. 

pests.1  He  delights  to  show  us  in  his 
famous  tailpieces  such  pictures  as  the 
ragged  rapscallions  that  abound  in 
streets,  graceless  and  cruel ;  beggars 
and  strollers  with  bear,  monkey,  or 
trumpet ;  lame  soldiers  and  wounded 
men,  real  or  sham ;  the  belated  traveller 
in  the  rain ;  the  snow-man  of  our 
childhood  ;  the  tipplers  with  their 
delightful  tall,  twisted-stemmed  wine- 
glasses, all  "  regardless  of  their  doom," 
or  returning  with  faltering  steps  from 
the  tavern  ;  the  man  on  the  stepping- 
stones,  bowed  down  with  his  burden, 
the  poor  mewing  cat  turning  round 
and  round  at  sea  in  a  tub.  Among 
his  principal  engravings  Bewick  gives 
us  in  his  "  Quadruped,"  and  with  a 
delicacy  and  force  that  no  modern 
workman  has  equalled,  for   instance, 


1  See  W.  Howitt,  "  The  Rural  Life  of  Eng- 
land," 1838,  vol.  ii. 


HANGING  IN  CHAINS.  89 

the  lion  rearing  a  majestic  crest,  and 
"  we  seem  to  hear  his  awful  voice,  rol- 
ling like  thunder  along  the  ground,  and 
cowing  all  nature  into  silence  ;  "  l  the 
tiger  with  his  fearful  glittering  eye, 
that  only  Rubens  or  Riviere  can  paint. 
Among  birds  we  may  recall  the  wood- 
cuts of  the  moping  thoughtful  owl ; 
the  water  ouzle,  with  his  white  waist- 
coat, sacred  to  the  rocks  of  the  Dove  ; 
and  the  carrion  crow  wheeling  round 
the  gibbet.  All  these  are  capital 
examples  of  Bewick's  skill ;  they  are, 
indeed,  as  fine  as  they  can  be,  and 
rendered  with  the  magic  touch,  with 
that  wonderful  feeling  for  nature  which 
just  make  the  difference  between  the 
plodding  draughtsman  and  the  born 
artist.  Many  persons  can  "  draw,"  but 
very  few  can  draw  even  tolerably. 
And  Bewick  chose,  like  Hogarth,  to 

1  See  W.  Howitt,  ut.  sup. 


90  HANGING  IN  CHAINS. 

portray  humanity  in  some  of  its 
degradations,  and  to  call  up  our  feelings 
against  violence  and  wickedness  and 
the  abuse  of  man's  high  quality.  He 
shrank  not  from  the  gibbet,  he  saw  its 
educational  value,  and,  with  absolute 
fidelity,  he  gives  us  many  examples 
of  the  time-honoured  horror,  standing 
out  stark  and  bare  against  the  bleak 
sky. 

In  a  late  year  of  the  last  century  a 
man  was  hung  in  chains  in  the  north 
of  England, — but  the  particular  place 
we  have  not  been  able  to  identify. 
And  we  lift  the  long-forgotton  crime 
up  to  notice  now  because  it  forms 
the  subject  of  a  tailpiece  by  Bewick 
to  the  Introduction  to  ''Carrion  Birds."1 
The  print  is  here  roughly  reproduced 
because  it  exhibits  some  particular 
features.     The  head  is  tied  up  in  a 

1  "  British  Birds,"  v.  p.  84. 


GIBBET. 

{From  a  woodcut  by  T.  Bewick,  "  British  Birds") 


HANGING  IN  CHAINS.  91 

white  cloth,  with  a  tender  touch  of 
feeling,  and  the  body  fastened  up  in 
irons  with  Doric  simplicity  ;  the  post 
is  stuck  full  of  thousands  of  nails,  like 
the  example  near  Carlisle,  to  pre- 
vent men  from  coming  and  climbing 
and  stealing  the  body  away — a  pre- 
cautionary measure  recalling  the  sentry 
of  Roman  times.1 


1  In  consequence  of  the  rarity  of  representa- 
tions of  gibbets,  it  may  be  desirable  to  mention 
other  examples  in  the  works  of  Thomas  Bewick, 
"British  Birds,"  Edit.  1832,  vol.  i.  In  a  tail- 
piece to  the  account  of  the  Alpine  Vulture,  p. 
53,  a  gibbet  is  shown  in  the  distance.  Tailpiece 
to  the  Introduction  to  the  Shrike,  p.  74 — a 
moonlight  scene,  with  a  gibbet  in  the  distance ; 
in  the  foreground  a  scared  old  man  is  terrified 
by  trees  and  rocks  whose  forms  assume  hob- 
goblin shapes.  Tailpiece  to  the  account  of  the 
Chatterer,  p.  105 — Satan  sits  upon  a  rock, 
smoking  a  pipe,  a  gibbet  in  the  distance.  Tail- 
piece to  the  account  of  the  Whitethroat,  p. 
261 — a  gibbet  in  the  distance.  "  Quadrupeds," 
first  Edit.,  1790.     Tailpiece  to  the  account  of 


92  HANGING  IN  CHAINS. 

the  Arctic  Fox,  p.  274 — a  gibbet  in  the  dis- 
tance ;  in  the  foreground  two  boys  hanging  a 
dog.  Tailpiece  to  the  account  of  the  Opos- 
sum, p.  375 — a  gibbet  in  the  distance;  in  the 
foreground  two  boys  belabouring  a  donkey. 


Z&r 


Chapter  x. 

[BOUT  the  year  1800  a  man 
named  Watson  was  execu- 
ted at  Lynn  for  the  murder 
of  his  wife  and  child.  The 
body  was  taken  to  Bradenham  Heath, 
and  there  gibbeted  in  irons.  Some 
few  years  ago  the  gibbet  was  still 
standing,  and  at  the  foot  of  it  Mr.  H. 
Rider  Haggard  and  his  brother  found, 
imbedded  in  the  sod,  the  upper  por- 
tion of  the  iron  framing,  including  the 
headpiece,  with  a  portion  of  the  skull 
remaining  in  it.  So  it  had  been  with- 
drawn from  sight  by  kindly  nature,  in 


94  HANGING  IN  CHAINS. 

her  pitying  mood,  and  covered  by  the 
greensward.  A  lady  of  that  neigh- 
bourhood, who  died  a  few  years  ago, 
aged  ninety-four,  used  to  relate,  that 
when  she  was  a  girl,  she  once  crossed 
the  gibbet  common,  and  noticed  that 
a  starling  had  built  her  nest  in  the 
man's  ribs ;  later  on  some  lovers  of 
nature  came  from  Shipdam  and  stole 
away  the  young  birds.  The  remains 
of  Watson's  irons  are  now  deposited 
in  the  Norwich  Gaol,  among  a  very 
interesting  collection  of  chains,  gyves, 
irons,  gang-chains,  and  burning  girths 
for  the  "  pale  martyrs  in  their  shirts 
of  fire." 

A  noteworthy  feature  in  this  case 
was,  as  in  that  of  John  Whitfield, 
before  mentioned,  that  it  got  about,  in 
latter  days,  in  the  neighbourhood,  that 
the  man  had  been  hung  up  alive,  and 
watched  till  he  died.  Similarly,  we 
have  a  story  from   Durham,  showing 


HANGING  IN  CHAINS.  95 

that  one  Andrew  Mills,  gibbeted  alive 
in  1684,  for  murdering  his  master's 
three  children,  was  kept  in  existence 
for  some  time  by  his  sweetheart  (of 
course),  who,  until  she  was  prevented, 
gave  him  milk  in  a  sponge  at  the  end 
of  a  stick.1 

These  kind  of  stories  usually  fall 
to  pieces  when  they  are  examined, 
and  it  so  happens  that  on  the  tomb- 
stone of  the  three  unfortunate  little 
children,  in  Merrington  churchyard,  are 
the  words  : — "  He  was  executed  and 
afterwards  hung  in  chains  ";  but  "  exe- 
cuted and"  have  been  nearly  obliterated 
by  deep  chisel  marks,2  thus  forming  at 
once  both  the  post  hoc  and  the  propter 
hoc  of  the  story.  As  to  the  milk,  and 
the  sweetheart,  this  part  of  the  fable 


1  "Notes  and  Queries,"  1872,  vol.  x.  p.  332. 
Fourth  Series. 

2  Ibid.,  p.  459. 


96  HANGING  IN  CHAINS. 

is  nothing  but  a  free  rendering — 
necessary  under  the  circumstances — 
of  the  classical  legends  of  Euphrasia 
and  Evander,  of  Xantippe  and  Cimo- 
nos.1  Tradition  often  does,  but  just 
as  often — or  oftener  does  not  justify 
itself.2 

1  "  There  is  a   dungeon,  in  whose  dim,  drear 
light 
What  do  I  gaze  on  ?  .  .  . 
An  old  man  and  a  female  young  and  fair, 
Fresh  as  a  nursing  mother,  in  whose  vein 
The  blood  is  nectar. 

Here  youth  offers  to  old  age  the  food, 
The  milk  of  his  own  gift ...  It  is  her  sire 
To    whom   she   renders   back  the    debt   of 

blood  .  .  . 
Drink,   drink  and   live,  old  man;    heaven's 
realm  holds  no  such  tide." 

"  Childe  Harold,"  iv.  st.  148. 
2  There  is  a  very  circumstantial  story  of  one 
Ambrose  Gwinnett,  who,  according  to  his  own 
statement,  was  hung,  and  hung  in  chains  at 
Deal  in  1709,  and  came  to  life  again,  and 
escaped  to  Florida.  But,  what  is  more  extra- 
ordinary still,  he  fell  in  with  the  very  man  he 
was  supposed  to  have  murdered,  survived  him  for 


HANGING  IN  CHAINS.  97 

This  suggests  a  few  words  upon  the 
question  of  hanging  alive  in  chains. 
Hollingshed,  in  his  "  Description  of 
England  " l  says  : — "  In  wilful  murder 
done  upon  pretended  (premeditated) 
malice,  or  in  anie  notable  robbery," 
the  criminal  "  is  either  hanged  alive 
in  chains  near  the  place  where  the 
fact  was  committed,  or  else,  upon 
compassion  taken,  first  strangled  with 
a  rope,  and  so  continueth  till  his  bones 
come  to  nothing."  Chettle,  in  "  Eng- 
land's Mourning  Garment,"  2  speaking 
of  the  clemency  of  Elizabeth,  says  : — 
"  Where-as  before  time  there  was  ex- 
traordinary torture,  as  hanging  wilfull 


many  years,  and  long  swept  the  way  at  Charing 
Cross.  The  whole  thing  is  in  print,  and  many 
people  are  apt  to  think  that  what  is  "in  print  " 
must  be  true.  See  "The  Life  and  Strange 
Voyages  and  Uncommon  Adventures  of  Am- 
brose Gwinnett."     London,  17  71. 

1  Pp.  184-5.  *  C.  4  vers. 

6 


98  HANGING  IN  CHAINS. 

murderers  alive  in  chaines  ;  she  having 
compassion  .  .  .  said  their  death  satis- 
fied for  death." 

These,  and  many  other  similar 
arbitrary  statements,  might  seem  con- 
clusive evidence ;  but,  on  the  other 
hand,  the  "  Statutes  at  Large  "  may  be 
vainly  searched  to  find  one  directing 
the  punishment  of  gibbeting  alive. 
And  when  we  recall  the  calm  language 
in  which  persons  are  directed  by  sta- 
tute to  be  boiled,  disembowelled,  or 
burnt  alive,  we  may  be  quite  sure  that, 
if  the  English  law  had  ever  contem- 
plated the  infliction  upon  a  subject 
of  such  lingering  torture  as  gibbeting 
alive,  it  would  have  been  as  coldly 
and  legally  set  forth,  and,  by  this  time, 
as  legally  repealed, — which  is  perhaps, 
more  to  the  point  still.  And,  further, 
it  is  difficult  to  believe  that  any 
English  official  would,  at  any  time, — 
whether   under   the   pressure   of   the 


HANGING  IN  CHAINS.  99 

hardening  influences  of  religious  in- 
tolerance, or  politics, — have  taken  upon 
himself  so  serious  a  responsibility,  or 
that  any  section  of  the  English  people 
would  have  suffered  such  wanton  bar- 
barity. The  conclusion  we  are  happily 
driven  to  is  that  both  Hollingshed, 
Chettle,  and  all  the  old  and  modern 
hare-brained  irresponsible  chatterers 
have  been  carried  away  by  a  super- 
stitious belief  in  a  poor,  vulgar  fiction, 
"  a  vain  thing  fondly  imagined," 
and  to  which  the  multitude  of  to-day 
still  appear  to  cling  with  a  fatuous  de- 
votion which,  probably,  no  amount  of 
education  or  refutation  will  ever  en- 
tirely eradicate.  This  shows  the 
strong  vitality  of  fiction. 

With  regard  to  the  punishment  of 
hanging  and  boiling,  alluded  to  above, 
a  single  example  will  suffice.  After 
the  suppression  of  the  Northern  Rising 
the   king  attacked  the  Friars.     Their 


ioo  HANGING  IN  CHAINS. 

popularity  and  poverty  alike  had  saved 
them  when  the  lesser  monasteries  fell  ; 
but  their  independence  and  boldness, 
in  preaching  against  the  Marriage 
question  and  the  Supremacy,  proved 
their  ruin.  Those  who  had  not  fled 
the  country  were  treated  with  the 
utmost  harshness.  Thus  Father  Stone, 
an  Austin  Friar  of  Canterbury,  for 
obstinately  maintaining  his  opinion 
that  the  king  may  not  be  head  of  the 
Church  of  England,  was  hung,  cut 
down,  and  his  body  boiled  and  quar- 
tered, as  appears  from  the  following 
very  curious  document  preserved 
among  the  records  of  the  city  of 
Canterbury: — "a.d.  1538-9.  Paid  for 
half  a  ton  of  timber  to  make  a  pair 
of  gallaces  to  hang  Father  Stone. 
For  a  carpenter  for  making  the  same 
gallows  and  the  dray.  For  a  labourer 
who  digged  the  holes.  To  four  men 
who  helped  to    set   up    the   gallows. 


HANGING  IN  CHAINS.  101 

For  drink  to  them.  For  carriage  of  the 
timber  from  stable  gate  to  the  dun- 
geon.1 For  a  hurdle.  For  a  load 
of  wood,  and  for  a  horse  to  draw 
him  to  the  dungeon.  For  two  men 
who  set  the  kettle  and  parboiled  him. 
To  two  men  who  carried  his  quarters 
to  the  gate  and  set  them  up.  For  a 
halter  to  hang  him.  For  two  half- 
penny halters.  For  Sandwich  cord. 
For  straw.  To  the  women  that 
scoured  the  kettle.  To  him  that  did 
execution ."  2 

An  obliging  correspondent  tells  us 
that  he  remembers  riding  with  his 
father,  in  1819,  under  a  gibbet  near 
Evesham,  and  the  creaking  of  the 
irons  as  they  were  swayed  by  the 
wind. 

1  The  hill  called  Dane  John,  near  Canterbury. 

2  Hist.  MSS.  Comm.  9th  Report.,  App.  158, 
quoted  in  "Henry  VIII.  and  the  English  Monas- 
teries," p.  260,  by  F.  A.  Gasquet. 


Chapter  xi. 

OWARDS  the  year  1808  a 
man  named  Thomas  Otter, 
alias  "  Tom  Temporal," 
was  hung  at  Lincoln  for 
the  murder  of  a  woman  with  whom  he 
cohabited  there.  It  appears  that  she 
had  followed  him  when  returning  into 
Nottinghamshire  where  his  wife  lived. 
At  the  junction  of  the  two  counties 
he  turned  on  her,  like  a  wild  beast, 
and  slew  her — in  a  lane  near  Saxilby, 
still  called  "  Gibbet  Lane  " — and  flung 
the  body  into  a  drain  dividing  the  two 
counties.    Not  exactly  knowing  which 


HANGING  IN  CHAINS.  103 

way  to  go  at  the  moment,1  the  bewil- 
dered miscreant  fled  back  as  quickly 
as  he  could  to  Lincoln,  was  captured, 
and  nearly  proved  an  alibi  at  the  trial. 
But  he  was  convicted  and  executed, 
and  hung  in  chains  on  the  fatal  spot. 
This  custom  had  then,  fortunately, 
fallen  somewhat  into  disuse  ;  but  even 
desuetude  had  its  drawbacks,  for 
crowds  came  to  see  the  spectacle, — 
just  as  all  Sheffield  and  Rotherham 
flocked  to  the  gibbet  of  that  famous 
highwayman,  Spence  Broughton,  on 
Attercliffe  Common  in  1792,  and  a 
stall  with  that  curious  cloying  refresh- 
ment— gingerbread — was  set  up,  after 
the  English  rural  fashion.  Subse- 
quently  some   inquiring  tomtits  were 


1  "I  saw  also  that  he  looked  this  way  and 
that  way,  as  if  he  would  run  ;  yet  he  stood  still, 
because  (as  I  perceived)  he  could  not  tell 
which  way  to  go."  ("  The  Pilgrim's  Progress," 
chap,  i.) 


104  HANGING  IN  CHAINS. 

attracted,  and  made  their  nest,  and 
hatched  seven  young  ones,  in  the 
upper  part  of  the  iron  frame  where 
the  head  was  fixed  ;  and  a  local  poet, 
in  the  fulness  of  his  heart,  produced 
the  following  riddle  : — 

"  10  tongues  in  one  head, 
9  living  and  one  dead, 
I  flew  forth  to  fetch  some  bread, 
To  feed  the  living  in  the  dead." 

(Answer)  "  The  tomtit  that  built  in  Tommy 
Otter's  head." 

Years  after,  our  informant,1  riding  in 
Gibbet  Lane,  came  to  the  gibbet  and 
saw  bones  and  rags  of  clothing  lying 
upon  the  ground,  and  the  skull  re- 
maining in  the  iron  headpiece.  Parts 
of  these  irons  are  now  preserved  at 
Doddington  Hall,  near  Lincoln. 

Another  courteous  correspondent  2 


1  Sir  C.  H.  J.  Anderson,  Bt. 

2  Dr.  Donnet. 


HANGING  IN  CHAINS.  105 

informs  us  that  nearly  seventy  years 
ago,  in  Malta,  on  the  occasion  of  a 
public  festival,  the  body  of  one  of  two 
brothers,  between  whom  a  feud  had 
long  existed,  was  found  murdered. 
Circumstantial  evidence  pointed  so 
strongly  to  the  survivor  as  the  assassin 
that  he  was  tried,  condemned,  and 
executed.  In  accordance  with  the 
Code  Rohan,  the  right  hand  was 
separated  from  the  body,  and  gibbeted 
in  an  iron  cage.  Some  years  had 
passed  by  when  a  man  dying  in  the 
Civil  Hospital  confessed  himself  to  be 
the  murderer ;  he  earnestly  begged 
that  something  might  be  done  to 
remove  the  stain  from  the  memory  of 
the  blameless  brother,  and  presently 
passed  away.  The  gibbeted  hand 
was  now  lowered  and  followed  to  a 
grave  by  an  impulsive  multitude  in 
sobs  and  tears,  uttering  prayers  and 
entreaties  for  the  repose  of  the  soul  of 


106  HANGING  IN  CHAINS. 

the  innocent  victim,  and  trusting  that 
the  ordeal  of  martyrdom  through 
which  he  had  passed  in  this  world 
might  prove  to  him  a  crown  of  glory 
in  the  next. 

The  same  correspondent  vividly  re- 
calls the  bodies  of  pirates  hung  in 
chains  on  the  walls  of  the  fort  of 
Ricasoli,  at  the  entrance  to  the  har- 
bour of  the  island  of  Malta,  as  seen 
by  him  in  1822. 

"A  Lady  Pioneer"  describes  an 
ancient  rusty  cage,  here  illustrated, 
seen  hanging  from  a  tree  by  a  friend 
in  Eastern  Bengal.  This  was  said  to 
have  been  used  as  a  punishment  for 
dacoits,  the  tradition  being  that  they 
were  hung  up  alive.1  The  shape  and 
careful  manufacture  almost  seem  to 
bear  this  out.  In  the  Asiatic  Society's 
Museum  at  Calcutta  an  iron  apparatus 

1  "  The  Indian  Alps,"  by  A  Lady  Pioneer, 
P-  32- 


IRON  CAGE  IN  EASTERN  BENGAL. 

{From  an  engraving  in  "  The  Indian  Alps") 


HANGING  IN  CHAINS.  16? 

for  the  same  purpose  is  preserved. 
Another  exists  in  Jamaica,  and  to  both 
the  same  legend  is  attached.1 

In  the  year  1827  a  chimney-sweep 
committed  a  murder  on  the  high  road 
near  Brigg,  and  was  tried  at  Lincoln. 
It  so  happened  that  the  new  Assize 
Courts  were  then  being  erected,  and 
the  Dean  and  Chapter  lent  their 
majestic  Chapter  House  for  the  trial. 
This  building  was  temporarily  fitted 
up  as  a  criminal  court,  the  trial  took 
place  in  it,  and  lasted  all  day,  and  in 
the  deepening  gloom,  under  the  shadow 
of  St.  Hugh's  great  minster,  Judge 
Best  sentenced  the  prisoner  to  death, 
and  ordered  the  body  to  be  hung  in 
chains  on  the  spot  where  the  crime 
was  committed.  It  is  well  remembered, 
by  a  gentleman  who  was  present,  what 
a  strange,  solemn,  and  striking  scene 

1  "  Notes  and  Queries,"  1873,  vol.  x.  p.  125. 
Fourth  Series. 


108  HANGING  IN  CHAINS. 

it  was.  The  inhabitants  of  Brigg 
petitioned  against  the  gibbeting,  on 
account  of  the  scene  of  the  murder 
being  so  very  near  the  town,  and  this 
horror  was  accordingly  remitted. 

In  1832,  on  the  occasion  of  a  pit- 
men's strike  at  Shields,  Mr.  Nicholas 
Fairies  was  the  only  resident  magis- 
trate, and,  as  such,  had  to  take  active 
steps  to  preserve  the  peace.  On  June 
nth  he  was  riding  to  Jarrow  Colliery 
when  he  was  attacked  and  pulled  from 
his  horse  by  two  men,  and  so  ill-treated 
that  he  died  on  the  21st.  One  of  the 
men  escaped,  the  other,  William  Job- 
ling,  was  taken,  tried  at  Durham,  and 
hung  on  August  3rd.  The  body  was 
escorted  by  soldiers  to  Jarrow  Slake, 
stripped,  covered  with  pitch,  and  re- 
clothed.  It  was  then  carefully  encased 
in  a  framework  of  iron, — the^face  being 
wrapped  in  a  white  cloth, — and  hung 
on  a  gibbet  twenty-one  feet  high  and 


HANGING  IN  CHAINS.  109 

bound  with  iron  bands.  The  post  was 
fixed  into  a  stone  of  one  and  a  half 
tons'  weight  which  was  sunk  into  the 
Slake  about  a  hundred  yards  within 
high-water  mark,  and  nearly  opposite 
the  spot  where  the  murder  was  com- 
mitted. Jobling's  gibbet  was  covered 
for  about  five  feet  up  by  the  high  tide. 
During  the  dark  night  of  August  31st 
the  body  was  stolen  away,  and  is  said 
to  have  been  buried  in  the  south-west 
corner  of  J  arrow  churchyard. 

It  is  a  curious  coincidence  that  while 
these  pages  have  been  passing  through 
the  press  Jobling's  widow  has  died 
(April  14,  1 891)  at  the  great  age  of 
ninety-six.  Thus  the  last  personal 
link  with  the  Gibbet  has  been  severed.1 


1  See  "  Proceedings,  Society  of  Antiquaries  of 
Newcastle-on-Tyne,"  in.  pp.  263,  308.  Sykes's 
"  Local  Records,"  ii.  pp.  365,  388. — Information 
from  Mr.  R.  Blair. 


i  io  HANGING  IN  CHAINS. 

The   last   example   of   hanging   in 

chains  : — 

.    "  Last  scene  of  all, 
That  ends  this  strange  eventful  history," r 

is  that  of  a  man  named  Cook,  a  book- 
binder, who  murdered  Mr.  Paas,  with 
the  iron  handle  of  his  press,at  Leicester, 
in  1834.  He  was  sentenced  to  death, 
and  the  body  ordered  to  be  gibbeted. 
This  was  done  in  Saffron  Lane,  out- 
side the  town,  and  the  disgraceful 
scene  around  the  gibbet,  as  described 
by  an  eye-witness,  was  like  a  fair.  A 
Dissenter  mounted  upon  a  barrel  and 
preached  to  the  people,  who  only 
ridiculed  him,  and  the  general  rioting 
soon  led  to  an  order  for  the  removal 
of  the  body.2  In  the  same  year  (4 
William  IV.)  Hanging  in  Chains  was 


1  As  You  Like  It,  Act.  ii.  sc.  7. 
3  "  Notes  and  Queries,"  1883,  vol.  viii.  p.  394. 
Sixth  Series. 


HANGING  IN  CHAINS.  1 1 1 

abolished  by  statute.  The  irons 
which  proved  so  strong  a  magnet 
are  now  preserved  in  Leicester  Gaol. 
Finally,  an  accomplished  Northamp- 
tonshire antiquary  i  informs  us  that 
many  years  ago  he  came  to  a  lone  hill 
at  Elsdon,  near  Morpeth,  in  North- 
umberland, and  found  a  gibbet  with  a 
wooden  head  hanging  from  it ;  this 
still  exists.  It  seems  that  the  murderer, 
whose  crime  it  recorded,  William  Win- 
ter, who  slew  Margaret  Crozier,  in 
1 791,  sat  down  to  his  lunch  in  a 
sheep-fold,  and  a  curious  shepherd-boy 
abstractedly  counted  the  nails  in  his 
boots,  and  noticed  his  peculiar  knife, 
and  this  led  to  his  apprehension.  The 
wooden  head  is  a  memorial  of  the 
savage  past,  a  relic  of  "  the  good  old 
times,"  which  we  may  truly  rejoice  to 
think  have  passed  away  for  ever. 


Sir  H.  E.  L.  Dryden,  Bt. 


112  HANGING  IN  CHAINS. 

We  have  now  dealt  with  some  of 
the  changeless  passions  in  what  the 
immortal  Castaway  calls  "  that  strange 
chequer-work  of  Providence,  the  life  of 
man."  We  have  traversed  the  gory- 
path  of  dishonour  from  end  to  end,  at 
times  with  wide  steps,  a  way  often 
obscure,  and  ever  slippery  with  blood. 
It  has  not  been  necessary  to  go  to 
mendacious  chroniclers,  or  scandalous 
diaries,  for  this  story  of  man's  high 
nature  in  some  of  its  degradations,  for 
we  have,  verily,  as  in  the  "  Visions  of 
Mirza,"  l  essayed  to  cross  the  bridge 
over  the  Vale  of  Misery  ;  we  have 
"  unloaded  all  the  gibbets,  and  pressed 
the  dead  bodies."  2 

It  has  been  impossible  to  treat  of 
such  a  ghastly  subject— of  which  the 
horrors  seem  to  burn  themselves  into 


1  Spectator,  No.  159,  Sept.  1,  171 1. 

2  King  Henry  IV.,  Part  i.  Act  iv.  sc.  2. 


HANGING  IN  CHAINS.  113 

the  mind — without  a  certain  amount 
of  ghastliness ;  indeed,  without  the 
plea  of  attempting  to  throw  a  ray  of 
light  into  some  of  these  dark  corners 
of  history,  we  should  almost  have 
flinched  from  bringing  forward  these 
melancholy  topics,  making  sensibility 
shudder,  and  which  our  readers  may, 
perchance,  find  it  a  pleasure  to  forget. 
And  in  imagination  we  already  hear 
the  cry — 

"  Vex  not  his  ghost :  O,  let  him  pass  !  he  hates 
him 
That  would  upon  the  rack  of  this  tough  world 
Stretch  him  out  longer."  1 

1  King  Lear,  Act  v.  sc.  3. 


THE    END. 


H4 


Note. — Any  notice  of  Gibbets  in  England 
would  be  incomplete  without  a  reference  to  the 
ifalifax  Gibbet.  This  instrument  of  speedy  but 
rough  justice  resembles  the  Guillotine.  It  re- 
mained in  use  until  1650,  and  records  exist 
showing  how  numerous  were  the  sufferers  under 
its  swift  blade.  The  Earl  of  Morton,  passing 
through  Halifax  about  the  middle  of  the  six- 
teenth century,  witnessed  an  execution,  and  is 
said  to  have  been  so  much  pleased  with  it  that 
he  had  a  similar  machine  made  for  Scotland, 
where  he  was  Regent.  It  long  remained  unused 
under  the  name  of  "The  Maiden."  But  on 
June  3,  1587,  the  Regent  was  himself  executed 
by  it.  Thus,  as  we  have  it  in  Hudibras,  he 
"  made  a  rod  for  his  own  breech."  The  Maiden 
is  now  preserved  in  the  Museum  of  the  Society 
of  Antiquaries  of  Scotland,  at  Edinburgh. — See 
"Halifax  and  its  Gibbet  Law,"  &c,  1756. 


IU^DEX. 

Ach^us,  his  end,  9. 

Alfric,  Archbishop,  Vocabulary  of,  13. 

Amasa,  fate  of,  5. 

Anastatius,  Saint,  martyrdom  of,  12. 

Anglo-Saxons,  the;  use  of  gallows  with,  13. 

Azariah,  burial  of,  1 

Baker,  the  Chief,  fate  of,  4. 

Bewick,  his  woodcuts,  87  ;  his  representations  of 

the  gibbet,  89,  91. 
Boiling  and  quartering,  example  of,  100. 
Brunne,  Robert,  14. 

Chains — see  Hanging  in. 
Chettle,  on  hanging  alive  in  chains,  97. 
Coligny,  hung  on  gibbet  of  Montfaucon,  40. 
Colman,  Saint,  martyrdom  of,  12. 
Constable,  Sir  Robert,  16. 
Cross,    the,    the    gibbet,    6,    9 ;    the   Christian 
emblem,  n. 


n6  INDEX. 

David,  burial  in  city  of,  i. 

Despencers,  the,  execution  and  quartering  of, 

19  ;  burial  of  their  remains,  ib. 
Douai,  gibbet  at,  51. 
Dreghorn,    Lord,    on    hanging    in    chains    in 

Scotland,  29. 

Egyptians,  the,  their  treatment  of  the  bodies 

of  criminals,  4. 
Etruscans,  their  gibbeting  on  a  cross,  9. 

Ferreolus,  Saint,  martyrdom  of,  12. 

Four  dies  Patibidaires,  31. 

Furca  (Gibbet),  use  of,  with  the  Romans,  1 1 . 

Galga  (Gallows),  use  of,  with  the  Anglo- 
Saxons,  13. 

Gallows  and  Gibbet,  difference  between,  in 
England,  25  ;  in  France,  ib. 

Gallows,  the,  in  England,  14 ;  in  Scotland,  29, 
30 ;  in  France, — -four dies  patibulairesi — 3  r ; 
their  monumental  character,  32  ;  in  Spain, 
42;  in  Holland,  46;  at  Douai,  51. 

Germans,  the,  punishments  with,  26. 

Gibbet  of  Montfaucon,  description  of,  ^ ; 
mode  of  operation,  35 ;  ancient  poetry 
concerning  it,  38 ;  of  Montigny,  39 ;  in 
England,  74 ;  effect  on  travellers  and 
traffic,  ib.;  of  Halifax,  114. 

Gibbet  riddle,  104. 

Gibbeting  of  animals,  in  France,  40 ;  in 
Holland,  45. 

Gloucester,  Robert  of,  14. 

Gower,  John,  16. 


INDEX.  117 

Halifax,  gibbet  of,  114. 

Hand  gibbeted  in  Malta,  105. 

Hanging  in  chains: — At  Easthampstead,  15; 
at  Hull,  16;  at  York,  ib. ;  in  Jersey,  2  2 ; 
in  England,  1631 — the  usual  custom,  27; 
in  Scotland,  1637, 29;  near  Edinburgh,  1688, 
30 ;  noticed  in  the  "  Pilgrim's  Progress," 
49 ;  at  Bourne,  Cambridgeshire,  53 ;  at 
Hampstead,  54 ;  near  Rugby,  ib.  ;  at 
Cawood,  near  York,  55  ;  near  London,  58  ; 
in  the  Orkneys,  61;  by  petition,  64;  at 
Rye,  66 ;  at  Carlisle,  ib. ;  at  Rake,  Sussex, 
67 ;  at  Long  Marston,  Buckinghamshire, 
69 ;  first  legally  recognized,  70 ;  terror 
evoked  at  prospect  of,  72;  preparation  of 
the  body  for,  73;  Thames  Pirates,  75,  78; 
in  Epping  Forest,  ib. ;  near  Penrith,  80 ; 
at  Tring,  81 ;  near  Wetheral,  Cumberland, 
ib. ;  on  Brandon  Sands,  double  gibbet, 
82 ;  near  Belper,  triple  gibbet,  83 ;  near 
Chester,  84 ;  near  Warrington,  85 ;  near 
Chester,  double  gibbet,  ib. ;  near  Mid- 
hurst,  86 ;  examples  illustrated  by  Bewick, 
90,  91;  near  East  Dereham,  93;  near 
Durham,  95 ;  at  Deal,  96 ;  near  Lincoln, 
103;  near  Sheffield,  ib.  ;  in  Malta,  106; 
in  Bengal,  ib. ;  at  Calcutta,  107;  in 
Jamaica,  ib. ;  ordered  near  Brigg,  but 
remitted,  108;  on  Jarrow  Slake,  ib. ;  near 
Leicester,  last  example  of,  no;  abolition 
of,  by  Statute,  ib. ;  wooden  head  in 
memoriam,  near  Morpeth,   in. 

Hanging  alive  in  chains,   fable  of,   94;    state- 


n8  INDEX. 

ments  of  Hollingshed  and  Chettle,  97 ; 
the  fiction  examined,  and  set  aside,  99. 

Hector,  his  desire  for  burial,  8. 

High  Treason  : — Punishment  for,  1 6  ;  descrip- 
tion of,  18;  Statute  of  1351,  ib. ;  first 
example  of,  1241,  ib. ;  Wallace,  ib. ;  the 
Despencers,  1 9  ;  Hotspur,  ib. ;  executions 
for  "the — 45,"  21 ;  pardon  of  five  gentle- 
men for,  1447,  22;  definition  of,  63; 
Jemmy  Dawson,  79. 

Hollingshed,  on  hanging  alive  in  chains,  97. 

Hotspur,  execution  and  quartering  of,  19;  the 
remains  again  brought  together,  ib. 

Jehoiakim,  denunciation  of,  3. 
Jeremiah,  prophecy  of,  3. 
Jersey,  hangings  in  chains  in,  22. 
Jews,  the,  treatment  of  their  dead,  4. 
Jotham,  burial  of,  1. 
Justice,  La,  La  Grande,  32. 

Kerrich,  Mr.,  his  sketches,  82. 

Leoninus,    Albertus,    on    suicide    with    the 

Romans,  10. 
Lincoln,    the    Chapter    House   at,    a   criminal 

court,  107. 

Malta,  a  hand  gibbeted,  105;  pirates  at,  106. 

Marise,  William,  a  pirate,  1241,  18. 

Medecis,  Catherine  de,  views  Coligny  on  the 

gibbet  of  Montfaucon,  40. 
Mezentius,  his  desire  for  burial,  7. 
Montfaucon,  gibbet  of,  33. 


INDEX.  119 

Montigny,  gibbet  of,  39. 

Norfolk,  Duke  of,  16. 
Northern  Rising,  1536,  16. 
Northampton,  behaviour  at,  76. 

Our  Saviour,  gibbeted,  1 1 . 

Peine  forte  et  dure,  61,  62. 

"  Pilgrim's  Progress,"  the,  hangings  in  chains  in, 

49. 
Piracy  in  the  Orkneys,  60. 
Pirates  gibbeted,  in  Jersey,  22  ;  on  the  Thames, 

75,  78;  in  Malta,  106. 
Preacher,  the,  on  lack  of  burial,  4. 

Quartering: — At  Carlisle  in  1536,  16;  of  a 
pirate,  in  124 1,  18 ;  of  Wallace, /£. ;  the 
Despencers,  19;  Hotspur,  ib.\  for  "the 
—45/'  21. 

Rack,  the,  62. 

Rizpah,  watches  of,  5,  6. 

Rhodez,  Count  of,  his  seizing  of  justice,  31. 

Robbing  the  mail,  83,  85,  86. 

Romans,  the,  their  dread  of  exposure,  9 ;  their 

use  of  the  furca,  or  gibbet,  1 1 ;  their  laws 

as  to  gibbeting,  72. 

Saints,  gibbeted,  12. 
Smugglers,  gibbeted,  67. 
Standing  Mute,  61,  62. 


i2o  INDEX. 

Statute  of  Westminster  the  First,  1277,  14;  of 
treason,  of  Edward  III.,  1351,  18;  of 
George  II.,  1752,  70,  72;  of  William  IV., 
1834,  no. 

Tarquinius    Priscus,   orders   gibbeting   on  a 

cross,  9. 
Thames  Pirates,  75;  chains  of,  ib. 

Villon  (Corbeuil),  his  poetry  on  the  gibbet  of 

Montfaucon,  38. 
Vincent,  Saint,  martyrdom  of,  12. 
Voltaire,  his  gallows  at  Ferney,  31. 

Wallace,  execution  and  quartering  of,  18. 
Weever.  on  punishment  for  treason,  murder,  &c, 

2  7  ;  on  hanging  in  chains,  ib. 
Witchcraft,  68. 
Women,   punishment   of,   in   England,   52 ;    in 

France,  53. 


% 


JNWIN   BROTHERS,   PRINTERS,   CHILWORTK   AND  LONDON.